[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-12-10 Thread kukeltje
no, not a similar api. You have to do it low level View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4270057#4270057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4270057 ___

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-12-09 Thread siva_movva
Hi, Is there a similar API in JBPM3 that allows subTask creation for an existing task? Any help would be appreciated. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4269914#4269914 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-12-01 Thread saraswati.santanu
Hi, This is a pretty late response. Out on a trip an could not access for few days. The way you are creating sub tasks may not work. You should use command service to get your job done instead of using direct methods on tasks. Command service will ensure all the interceptors are invoked

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-11-20 Thread fabiomsouto
Thank you for your help. It has helped us a lot to think a bit more and know jbpm. We are trying to follow a similar solution to yours, but, when we try to create a new subtask on a task, an exception occurs: | | 09:41:12,935 SEV | [BaseJbpmTestCase] TEST THROWS EXCEPTION: no

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-11-10 Thread fabiomsouto
Hi, Thank you for your reply. It was helpful. We are using the Assignment Handler right now. Now we would like to create several instances of the 'Review' task, one for each user. How can we garantee that the next task will only start executing when all of the 'Review' tasks are done? We are

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-11-10 Thread fabiomsouto
Sorry for double posting. Is it possible to do this using a custom ActivityBehaviour? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4264796#4264796 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4264796

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-11-10 Thread saraswati.santanu
How about creating sub-tasks in you actual task? Signalling flag will be false for the sub-tasks by default. So it will not transit to the next node till you call complete on the super task. The following code may be used when the review task becomes active | Task reviewTask =

[jboss-user] [jBPM Users] - Re: Advice regarding complex proccess modeling

2009-11-06 Thread saraswati.santanu
Hi, did you consider using Assignment handler? If you implement Read Document as a task node and add an assignment handler to it, which can execute whatever business logic it needs to, to decide whether X, Y or Z or all of them or none of them can do Read task. | ... | task name=read