Hello,
I have been using firebird 1.0 on Redhat 7.1, kernel 2.4.9-21 with
JBoss3.0.0RC2. I am trying to deploy some EJBs. These EJBs run fine on
my Mac OS X 10.1.4/JBoss-3.0.0RC2/Firebird1.0 setup but fail to run on
Linux.
I noticed that JBoss is using a "user.name" env variable [which
cor
Whenever I get this error, it is because a class
definition is not complete or is not visible. Make sure AccountInfo is
visible to JBoss.
- Original Message -
From:
G.L. Grobe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:39 PM
Subject: [JBoss-user]
[ERROR
I'm getting errors like below on all of my session
and entity beans, yet, my beans still run fine and I'm seeing no problems
besides this output.--- snip ---[ERROR,ContainerFactory] Bean :
AccountMethod : public abstract boolean addAccount(AccountInfo) throws
RemoteExceptionSection: 9.2.7War
Right now it is certainly harder than it should be to set up many jboss
instances on the same box, but if it was reasonably easy wouldn't this be a
safer way to run several applications at once?
david jencks
On 2002.05.17 13:31:08 -0400 Dan Christopherson wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
> >
> > Wh
I have a utility class that uses JAAS to make an SSL connection for credit
card authorization. This class works fine outside of JBoss but fails when
used within a stateless session bean. The error is:
java.net.MalformedURLException: unknown protocol: https
The init of the utility class makes
Hi all,
I am using latest JBoss 3.0. I have my own subclass
called "DOMUtil.java" under "com.abc.util" package. When I tried to use this
class under my Entity bean, then Jboss application server never exceute
this class.
Any one can suggest me why it is not
executing the class "DOMUtil.
No, I'm saying I need it to. It's working in 2.4.5 right now.
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> Are you saying that this works for you?
>
> I tried to do the same thing and it didn't work...
>
> Two EARs, each with own Web contexts, similar ejb-jars, same class names,
> same ejb-names, different JNDI na
Are you saying that this works for you?
I tried to do the same thing and it didn't work...
Two EARs, each with own Web contexts, similar ejb-jars, same class names,
same ejb-names, different JNDI names.
Hunter
> From: Dan Christopherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date:
David Jencks wrote:
>
> Why would you want to have several versions of a class deployed at once?
> Is this a real use case?
>
Another one: two applications that are deployed on the same server using
different versions of the same framework. This is a very common situation.
-danch
_
Duplicate web apps work because they use seperate class loading level.
I'm working on a whitepaper to describe the 3.0 class loading arch
and will post it for comments today or tomorrow.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-
Hi,
Using jboss-3.0.0RC1_tomcat-4.0.3, I have tried (for a
second time) to follow the JBoss' tutorial on their online documentation:
http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/index.html
However I have stumbled exactly on the same spot twice :-) while running:
. . . examples\build>ant intro-in
David Jencks wrote:
> On 2002.05.16 20:39:45 -0400 Paul Cody wrote:
>
>>Wow, I'm really surprised to hear this. Sorry if this is a stupid
>>question,
>>but what is the benefit of class visibility between hotdeploys? Stuffing
>>everything into a single classloader namespace seems like a high pri
Greetings.
Our mailing list has been getting spammed with this off-topic sexual commercial
advertisement daily for almost a week now. Please terminate this
user for spamming as per your TOS/AUP.
Attn: Data Communication Bureau (cn.net), ChinaNet;
You appear to be providing the connectivity fo
David Jencks wrote:
> On 2002.05.16 20:39:45 -0400 Paul Cody wrote:
>
>>Wow, I'm really surprised to hear this. Sorry if this is a stupid
>>question,
>>but what is the benefit of class visibility between hotdeploys? Stuffing
>>everything into a single classloader namespace seems like a high p
I forgot to mention caching in my previous post.
Look if your jboss uses large disk space (files), then part of it must
appear as RAM cached, which also substracts from your free MEM.
Think of going redhat 7.2 (REALLY STABLE, performer, (Beats FreeBSD 4.5 by
10%))
Think of going blackdown.
We h
15 matches
Mail list logo