he ORC5 tag in CVS...ORC4 is the latest I see for 3.2?
BR> -Billy
BR> From: Alex Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR> To: Billy Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Compound PK using CMR/CMP
BR> >Could you please try JBoss-3.2.0RC5 from CVS?
BR>
Hello Billy,
it should be fixed in current CVS version for all branches.
alex
Friday, April 04, 2003, 10:56:39 PM, you wrote:
BR> Hi All,
BR> I have an Entity EJB deployed to JBoss-3.0.6 that has a single CMR
BR> field. In my jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file, I have the datasource and
BR> datasource-
Could you please try JBoss-3.2.0RC5 from CVS?
It should work. You can check a testcase in
org.jboss.test.cmp2.fkmapping package.
alex
Friday, April 04, 2003, 8:38:58 PM, you wrote:
BR> Hi All,
BR> I have created an Entity EJB that maps to a table with a compound PK
BR> (both columns are NOT NUL
Could you, please, try JBoss-3.2.0RC5 from cvs?
There were a lot of changes in the code since 3.2.0RC3
Thanks,
alex
Friday, April 04, 2003, 4:46:34 PM, you wrote:
CM> Hi all,
CM> I am using jboss3.2.0RC3, jdk1.3.1_06, database Hypersonic.
CM> My application description
CM> -BeanA and BeanB ha
Please, post to jboss-user.
Provide more info on mapping of entities and relationships, tables
in the database and exception.
Could you try your app in JBoss-3.2?
alex
Friday, April 04, 2003, 4:23:18 AM, you wrote:
BR> Hi,
BR> I have created an Entity EJB that maps to a table with a compound
Thursday, April 03, 2003, 3:35:05 PM, you wrote:
SM> Hi,
SM> Is it possible to preload all the entities returned from a finder?
Yes, with read-ahead.
SM> I have a finder method that returns many rows (around 100) and the read-ahead
strategy does not help at all.
Does not help or does no
AFAIK, catalina is for Tomcat-4.0.x.
So, tomcat41 is for you.
You don't need to look at build.xml file. In tomcat41, there should be
a readme file with instructions. Just follow them and there shouldn't
be problems.
alex
Wednesday, April 02, 2003, 5:49:24 PM, you wrote:
SM> Hi,
SM> I am try
Please, post to jboss-user.
Maybe the problem is in case-sensitivity? Make sure CMP and foreign
key fields have the same name and use the same case.
alex
Wednesday, April 02, 2003, 7:56:41 AM, David Wang wrote:
DW> I have 2 CMP entity beans that have one to many relationship. The "Many"
DW> sid
David, you are on the wrong list. I am forwarding you to jboss-user.
1. Set debug to true
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/"; debug="true">
2. remove Threshold for CONSOLE
3. set DEBUG for org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp
alex
Wednesday, April 02, 2003, 5:45:38 AM, David Wang
You have to pass dates as a parameter to the query.
Instead of real dates put in the query ?1, ?2, ...
And then ejbSelectMethod(jbossQl.toString(), args), where args
contains instances of Date.
alex
Tuesday, April 01, 2003, 2:17:15 PM, Brijesh Sood wrote:
BS> Hi All , I have to create dynamicq
Relationships are allowed between entities declared in the same
ejb-jar.xml.
You can put third party beans somewhere in the class path and create
your ejb-jar.xml that will define thirdparty beans, your beans and
relationships between them.
alex
Tuesday, April 01, 2003, 4:32:54 PM, Ionel Gardais
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, April 01, 2003, 2:18:37 AM, Bill Curtis wrote:
BC> hello...
BC> I have an existing table, A, which has a 1..* relationship with itself.
BC> This relationship makes us of an existing mapping table, B.
BC> I have inherited these tables, and unfortunately cannot alter them.
Tuesday, April 01, 2003, 3:00:13 PM, Ionel Gardais wrote:
IG> Hi,
IG> is it possible to access additional fields in a CMR relation table ?
IG> example : a Book table filled with Book entries, a Person tagle filled
IG> with people infos and a CMR relation table that stores who loans what.
IG> D
ject: Re: [JBoss-user] CMR Error under load
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>I don't see a RC5 release on sourceforge, so I assume this means I have
SM> to
>> >
>> > build it from
>> >
>> >>CVS. I'll give that a go, b
Using optimistic locking with timestamp_column_strategy means an
entity will be added a timestamp column that will be used for
optimistic locking. It can't be accessed by application. (Indeed, it
should be possible to mention it in a QL statement)
If you want a CMP timestamp field to be used in op
escribed, but the fix should bin in 3.2 rc4.
>>
>> Until someone can create a test case that reproduces the new bug, I
>> don't think there is much we can do.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 10:01 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
>>
>&
Just ported the fix to JBoss_3_0.
You need to check out the source from CVS and build it yourself.
For 3.0 version:
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss
co -r Branch_3_0 jboss-3.0
alex
Monday, March 31, 2003, 3:02:15 PM, Jboss Percy wrote:
JP> I use the normal download (with Tomc
What JBoss version are you using?
This was fixed in Branch_3_2 recently.
alex
Monday, March 31, 2003, 2:05:25 PM, Jboss Percy wrote:
JP> I am new to JBoss and to MySql (although the problem has not
JP> specifically to do with MySql).
JP> I am trying to port a rather large application from Borlan
Hello Andrew,
you are not alone complaining about this. But nobody could produce a
testcase that fail at least eventually.
I am trying to reproduce it but can't for the moment.
I have a Parent and 1000 of related Child entities.
I have 100 concurrent threads finding parent by primary key, gettin
No, not at the moment. Foreign key fields should represent primary key
fields. Probably, we'll address secondary keys in JBoss-4.
alex
Tuesday, March 25, 2003, 7:55:31 PM, you wrote:
NS> Okay, I'm just trying to find a simple piece of information. Can a one
NS> to many CMR be created that refer
entity
SM> com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybSQLException: Column name MV_MDS_ID appears more
SM> than o
SM> nce in the result column list.
SM> Because the CMP fileds and CMR fields do overlap - See JDBCEntityBridge line
SM> 151
SM> Thanks!!!
SM> Simone
SM> - Original Message -
Cxd> Mobile: +353 86 824 0736
JOCxd> Alex Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JOCxd> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JOCxd> 24.03.2003 15:52
JOCxd> Please respond to jboss-user
JOCxd> To: Simone Milani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JOCxd> cc:
JOCxd>
ID appears more
SM> than o
SM> nce in the result column list.
SM> Because the CMP fileds and CMR fields do overlap - See JDBCEntityBridge line
SM> 151
SM> Thanks!!!
SM> Simone
SM> - Original Message -
SM> From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL
This should be fixed now.
Could you try current CVS version for Branch_3_2?
Thank you,
alex
Monday, March 24, 2003, 1:43:06 AM, Michael Nowotny wrote:
MN> Hello!
MN> I'm getting a StackOverflowException while population a CMR Entity Bean. What's
special about the relation is that it uses prima
ginal Message -
SM> From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SM> To: "Jonathan.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SM> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:06 PM
SM> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-user] CMR with FK in the database
>> JBoss-3.2 no
JBoss-3.2 now supports NON-NULL foreig keys if foreign key fields are
mapped to NON NULL CMP fields.
alex
Monday, March 24, 2003, 1:50:17 PM, Jonathan O'Connor wrote:
JOCxd> Simone,
JOCxd> Look for previous messages about INSERT after ejbPostCreate.
JOCxd> If you use oracle you can also mark the
Hello Christofer,
I guess, you are using CMR setter to establish relationship. In case
of FK fields are mapped to primary key columns you can't use CMR
setters, as it involves changing primary key value that is not
allowed.
Perhaps, I might not throw this exception if new value does not change
pri
Hello Michael,
it's a bug. I'll fix it today ASAP.
alex
Monday, March 24, 2003, 1:43:06 AM, you wrote:
MN> Hello!
MN> I'm getting a StackOverflowException while population a CMR Entity Bean. What's
special about the relation is that it uses primary key fields as part of the relation
(no for
Please, submit a bug report and include all this info.
Thank you,
alex
Thursday, March 20, 2003, 5:20:34 PM, Simone Milani wrote:
SM> Hi,
SM> I am using 3.2.0 RC3 and have a an entity bean with a one to many relation
with another entity bean. Both uses Optimistic Locking with modified sta
How will this differ or what benefits will it have comparing to
timestamp version column strategy already implemented?
alex
Thursday, March 20, 2003, 1:31:33 PM, Simone Milani wrote:
SM> Hi,
SM> The sybase database includes a type called TIMESTAMP which is effectively a
VARBINARY(8) and i
Richard,
could you provide more info about the entity? How can I reproduce it?
Thanks,
alex
Monday, March 17, 2003, 10:14:47 PM, you wrote:
RS> Jboss is creating a malformed SQL statement in creating a table. It
RS> sticks an extra invalid parenthesis in "NUMB_TYPE NUMBER(3)) NOT NULL"
RS> How
NULL if at least
one column that is not a primary key one contains NULL value.
It could be still hard to grasp. If you have a real problem then
describe it and we'll follow a real example.
alex
CB> Thanks,
CB> Chad
CB> Alex Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:DS> 3.2
oice.
alex
MWB> Anyway, thanks for all the info and explanations.
MWB> Bernie
MWB> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
MWB> Von: Alex Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MWB> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. März 2003 20:28
MWB> An: Dain Sundstrom
MWB> Betreff: Re[2]: [JBoss-user] CMP E
DS> 3.2 supports not null foreign keys, but you will have to ask Alexey how
DS> to set it up.
Just map foreign key fields to primary key columns.
This case is not trivial and we had hot debates on this topic with
Dain and Jeremy. If foreign key fields mapped to primary key fields is
what you need
JBoss supports FK fields mapped PK columns since version 3.2.
alex
Saturday, March 08, 2003, 10:16:17 PM, you wrote:
JD> Hi All,
JD> The following extract came from Middlegen FAQ at:
JD> http://boss.bekk.no/boss/middlegen/faq.html
JD> "It's also important to realise that different EJB contain
Just configure the key fields on the one side, i.e.
mDSKeyMatrix-has-mDSMatrixs.
alex
Friday, March 07, 2003, 11:01:22 AM, Simone Milani wrote:
SM> Hi,
SM> I have a problem with the relationship on the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generated by the
current cvs version of Xdoclet:
SM> org.jboss.deployment
Thursday, March 06, 2003, 12:20:54 PM, Ionel Gardais wrote:
IG> Hi,
IG> Is it possible to automatically narrow the results of a finder ?
IG> i.e : finder findByName(String name) on PersonBean is likely to return a single
result each time so the signature can be com.test.interface.PersonneLocal
default, pk-sql, key-generator, with jdk1.4 get-generated-keys.
alex
Wednesday, March 05, 2003, 9:47:44 PM, Dennis Gesker wrote:
DRG> In JBoss 3.2RC3 I see alot of entity commands that appear to be database
specific. Which of these can be used with Postgres?
DRG> Thanks
DRG> Dennis
DRG>
I just added HiLo key generator to HEAD.
Now, using entity-command configuration, it's possible to create
entities with either "known" or unknown primary keys using UUID or
HiLo key generators.
Key generator is deployed with *-service.xml. Here is an excerpt from
hilo-service.xml:
j
.
JV> jordi
JV> - Original Message -
JV> From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JV> To: "Jordi Valldaura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JV> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:09 PM
JV> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] RC2 possible bug in m:n relationships
It should work. Could you provide a test case?
alex
Tuesday, March 04, 2003, 2:12:30 PM, Jordi Valldaura wrote:
JV> Hello,
JV> I've been working with 3.0.6 and yesterday I decided to change to 3.2rc2.
JV> But
JV> one of my bean relationship stopped working, I have another m:n relationship
JV> a
or Oracle too.
You can look at JDBCAbstractVendorCreateCommand.java and, say,
JDBCHsqldbCreateCommand.java for example. It's quite simple.
alex
DW> thx.
DW> Mensaje citado por Alex Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Not in 3.0 branch. You need to upgrade to 3.2.
>&g
This means the entity will be read-only, i.e. write operations are not
allowed. But it is still locked in transactions.
AFAIK, you can use method-level read-only flag to avoid locking. Check
the dtd for jboss.xml for details how to set it up.
alex
Monday, March 03, 2003, 8:14:11 PM, Jon Swinth wr
quot;Real programmers don't write in BASIC. Actually, no
SJ> programmers write in BASIC after reaching puberty."
--
Best regards,
Alex Loubyansky
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thi
If I remember correctly, you can mark the method as read-only to void
bean lokcking while invocation. This is setup in jboss.xml Check the
dtd for details.
alex
Monday, March 03, 2003, 5:14:13 PM, Brian McSweeney wrote:
BM> Hi guys,
BM> I reckon I'm going to come across as a dope here, but anyw
Rene,
the driver you are using doesn't have method
java.sql.ResultSet PreparedStatement.getGeneratedKeys().
You need to upgrade the driver.
alex
Thursday, February 27, 2003, 4:55:18 AM, Rene Palad wrote:
RP> Hi,
RP> I'm following the recent discussion about PK
RP> generation in 3.2 specificall
This is used only for factory or database generated primary keys.
Unfortunately, it's not yet documented, so, ask specific questions
here.
Also, you could check jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd and
standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml for structure and sample configurations.
alex
Monday, February 24, 2003, 1:26:05 PM,
Please, try to search the archive before asking. I answered this
question many times and last one was just yesterday.
Specifically for MySQL, in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml in the entity element:
id
knownid
INTEGER
INTEGER(11)
DJ> I have no idea what that is. Doesn't the mysql example config file
DJ> indicate the recommended driver?
DJ> david
DJ> On 2003.02.21 14:03 nfs_ nfs wrote:
>>
>> Hi david jencks,
>>
>> Can i use MySQLTM Connector/J ? with mysql and JBoss.
Yes, that's it.
alex
-
i have no .. descriptors in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml and
MG> no getId()/setId(..) in my bean.
MG> my ejbCreate() looks like
MG> public java.lang.Object ejbCreate() throws CreateException {
MG> return null;
MG> }
MG> i have no ejbFindByPrimaryKey defined...
MG> greetings
MG> ma
This means there are no more available connections in the pool.
Make sure you properly handle them, i.e. closing them correctly. Also
more info about what you are doing would give more response.
alex
Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:17:40 AM, nfs_ nfs wrote:
nn> Hi all,
nn> Anyone knows why this erro
Frank,
the problem is that, the order of elements in web.xml should match the
order of elements declaration in web-app_2_3.dtd or web-app_2_2.dtd
(depends on the spec version you use).
Here is the snippet:
I would like to run a filter on every jsp with 3.0.6. I thought if I
FM> put the followin
Markus,
first of all, check Unknown primary key paragraph in the spec if you
didn't yet.
In a short:
- no cmp accessors for the unknown pk field;
- ejbCreate declares java.lang.Object as a return type
- ejbFindByPrimaryKey takes java.lang.Object as a parameter
- in ejb-jar.xml java.lang.Object
- n
As I understand, it asks for
at the beginning of the file.
alex
Thursday, February 13, 2003, 1:07:01 PM, you wrote:
GK> Hi
GK> I tried deploying my sample connector, and it got
GK> deployed successfully. But it was not bonded to the
GK> JNDI name.
GK> To provide this I have tried preparing a
Thursday, February 13, 2003, 12:08:45 AM, you wrote:
FH> It may be due to this JVM bug fixed in 1.3.1_07
FH> 4523757
FH> The javac compiler explicitly closes ZipFile objects allowing those resource
FH> to be reclaimed.
FH> from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/ReleaseNotes.html
Sorry, how is javac re
Wednesday, February 12, 2003, 4:02:41 PM, you wrote:
DW> Brian,
DW> Look at the "Deprecated and Removed" section on this page:
DW> http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/development/design.html . Yes,
DW> @use-soft-locking is going to go away (at least in XDoclet 2.0).
DW> Now that I think of it, was
Required.
alex
Tuesday, February 11, 2003, 3:32:33 PM, you wrote:
JH> In ejb-jar.xml one can (and should) define the applications
JH> transaction policy. This is typically done in two levels, per bean
JH> and per finder methods, is it?
JH> Anyway, what happens if you _don't_ give any specifics?
Transaction configurations in XPetstore-2.2 aren't spec 2.0 compliant.
CMP beans can have only Required, RequiresNew or Mandatory tx
attrs, while in XPetstore we can meet Supports and even NotSupported
(Account.getUserId()).
I didn't run the XPetstore on 3.0 but I ran it on JBoss-3.2RC2 and
HEAD.
This is fixed in JBoss-3.2.0RC2
alex
Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 5:40:29 PM, you wrote:
BM> Hi guys,
BM> I'm unable to delete my jars from server/default/deploy when running this latest
version of JBoss.
BM> Not sure why, it wasn't a problem in the previous versions.
BM> Ideas?
BM> Also, it s
it in the plan if it's not there yet.
alex
HH> Basically I want the distinct operation to not be case sensitive. I have a
HH> list of strings... Some upper case, some lower case and I want them all to
HH> sort alpha, without regard to case.
HH> Thanks in advance,
HH> Hunter
&
Hunter,
you can't use functions in the SELECT, they are allowed only in
the WHERE clause.
alex
Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 7:47:06 PM, you wrote:
HH> I am trying to get the following query to the DB:
HH> SELECT DISTINCT UPPER(vendor) FROM sample_request_line_item WHERE vendor IS
HH> NOT NULL OR
sorry for stupid question, but didn't you accidently add '(' when formatted for
readability?
you can also remove brackets around IS NULL expression.
alex
Monday, January 27, 2003, 12:48:06 PM, you wrote:
JH> Is anyone able to tell me what is wrong with the following ejbql
JH> expression (format
Joey,
could you try it and tell what problems you met with WL7.0 apps and what you would
like to improve? It shouldn't take much time I think.
Thanks,
alex
Friday, January 24, 2003, 5:54:50 PM, you wrote:
JG> --- Rob Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See http://www.jboss.org/services/bea-port
This is fixed in CVS.
alex
Thursday, January 23, 2003, 10:09:25 AM, you wrote:
RH> Hi,
RH> in older versions, I was just able to delete a .ear in deploy/
RH> and it got undeployed. Or I could overwrite it with a new one
RH> which got hot deployed.
RH> In RC1, this is no longer possible, as Win2
Beau,
could you, please, provide simple/not-simple testcase at least for one
of the cases?
Thanks,
alex
Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 10:47:57 PM, you wrote:
BC> Complete stack traces are attached. Sorry I didn't give them last time.
BC> You may well be right about why these deadlocks not occu
what is the problem? what locking policy are you using?
alex
Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 8:43:05 PM, you wrote:
BC> I have a Swing app which is essentially single-threaded, accessing the
BC> server in the usual way through a session facade. I'd like to do some
BC> background loading of certa
- compound foreign keys are supported by all JBoss versions;
- foreign key fields mapped to primary key fields are supported only
since JBoss-3.2;
- foreign key fields mapped to non-primary key CMP fields are not
supported at all.
It's not documented yet. Ask your questions here, but, please, try
Raymond,
could you provide more info about the bean and the way you are trying
to load it?
alex
Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 2:29:32 PM, you wrote:
BR> Hi all,
BR> I have an entity bean that retreives data from the following table:
BR> CREATE TABLE testnullvalues.DomainClass (
BR> id
Matthew,
you are trying to access local interfaces/relationships remotely.
This is not allowed by the spec and implementation.
alex
Monday, January 20, 2003, 10:17:03 PM, you wrote:
HM> Hi--
HM> I'm trying to configure jboss 3.0.4 w/tomcat4.1.12 for CMR for two tables in
HM> our Oracle DB. I
Anthony,
did you write it by mistake?
You need an ejb-ref or ejb-local-ref in order to access EJBs in java:comp/env
context.
alex
Monday, January 20, 2003, 5:01:12 PM, you wrote:
>> Why it is not possible to call an EJB from another EJB using
>> lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/EJBsName") ?
AG> It is
Klaas,
relationships can be established only with local interfaces and, thus,
accessed only localy, in the same VM. That's by the spec.
alex
Monday, January 20, 2003, 3:47:30 PM, you wrote:
KvdP> Hi All,
KvdP> I have successfully deployed some entitybeans on my jboss 3.0.4 server. I'm
KvdP> u
Monday, January 20, 2003, 2:02:11 PM, you wrote:
JF> Am i right when i say that the 32rc1 release only allows a fk to be apart of a pk
but not allowing a cmr foreign key to also be a
JF> cmp field?
yes
JF> Jboss4.0?
not currently implemented but planned
alex
--
There is a dynamic-ql for this.
In the bean:
public abstract Collection ejbSelectMyDynamicQuery(String ejbQl,Object[] args)
throws FinderException;
Where ejbQl is EJBQL/JBossQL query, args - array of parameters.
In jbosscmp-jdbc.xml:
ejbSelectMyDynamicQuery
PK> Thanks Alex, but I'm trying to access the datasource from within JBoss
PK> (CMP)...
Sorry, being in inattentive. You need
java:/mySQLDS.
alex
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex
>> Loubya
The datasources can't be accessed outside the VM JBoss is running in.
alex
Thursday, January 16, 2003, 2:22:26 AM, you wrote:
PK> Hi there,
PK> I'm unable to get a MySql datasource configured and know that it's probably a dumb
configration
PK> error on my part, but I've spent a day trying to f
I am sorry, looks like, forgot to port the fix into JBoss-3.0.
This is currently fixed in CVS.
Sorry,
alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexey Yudichev
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-use
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 12:24:14 PM, you wrote:
JViR> I have a bean A with multiple primari key (id, language)
JViR> I have another bean B who has cf_id
JViR> Can I now make a relationship from B to A using cf_id???
Yes, if cf_id is a primary key column in B.
alex
JViR> I've seen some
JVi
This is fixed in CVS in JBoss-3.0, JBoss-3.2 and HEAD.
Thanks,
alex
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 1:52:18 PM, you wrote:
PH> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:30:55PM +0200, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
PH> (About setting up relations in a 1-N relation on the N-side)
>> both cases should wor
f
the same bug.
Thank you,
alex
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 1:52:18 PM, you wrote:
PH> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:30:55PM +0200, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
PH> (About setting up relations in a 1-N relation on the N-side)
>> both cases should work. Could you provide a testcase for the pr
wrote:
JC> Alex Loubyansky wrote:
>>Hello Jim,
>>
>>I don't remember the right bean/field names but something like this,
>>assuming you pass in organization's id
>>
>>SELECT OBJECT(gun) FROM Organization AS org, IN(org.gangsters) AS gang,
>IN(ga
Hello Panu,
both cases should work. Could you provide a testcase for the problem?
I can't reproduce it.
alex
Monday, January 13, 2003, 2:50:06 PM, you wrote:
PH> Hi all!
PH> Can't you modify a N-1 CMP relation by assigning the 1-end
PH> to the single value field on the N-end? At least it
PH> s
Hello Jim,
I don't remember the right bean/field names but something like this,
assuming you pass in organization's id
SELECT OBJECT(gun) FROM Organization AS org, IN(org.gangsters) AS gang, IN(gang.guns)
AS gun WHERE org.id=?1
As the result you'll get all guns used in the organization.
alex
Hello John,
only entity beans in the same package can have relationships.
alex
Saturday, January 11, 2003, 10:52:49 AM, you wrote:
JF> Hi,
JF> Is it possible to define a cmr field that references a bean in another
JF> java package? How about in another jar?
JF> What are the basic rules for pa
SL> - if you redeploy your bean and use the create-table feature of CMP, JBoss
SL> will re-create the table (but not update it => you loose your data).
No, JBoss won't recreate the table if remove-table wasn't set to true.
The table will remain the same. Thus, if entity's structure/definition
cha
Randahl,
do not, please, post it to the development list.
The testsuit deals with byte[] instead of java.lang.Object, though.
But, nevertheless, try different mappings first. Try also BLOB instead
of JAVA_OBJECT.
alex
Friday, January 10, 2003, 1:18:46 PM, you wrote:
RFI> That sure is a construc
Hello Randahl,
there are BLOB tests in the testsuit that pass successfully.
So, I think your problem is a mapping. Have you tried different
mapping?
alex
Friday, January 10, 2003, 11:34:19 AM, you wrote:
RFI> I am wondering if anyone has got an EJB working on 3.0.4 with a property
RFI> which is
sing xdoclet-1.2-b2. also, reading
SR> through the pay docs, they show an example (listing 3-7) that does not use
SR> the . instead, they only override the column name
SR> within the .
SR> is it required to have the element? can it be
SR> generated from xdoclet?
SR> Ryan
S
audit_process_code
SR>
SR>
SR> audit.dateCreated
SR> audit_insert_dtm
SR>
SR>
SR>
Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex
>> Loubyansky
>> Sent: 24. desember 2002 20:28
>> To: JBoss-User
>> Subject: [JBoss-user] FK fields mapped to PK fields support ported to
>> JBoss-3.2
>>
>
Hello Muntean,
Monday, January 06, 2003, 4:43:25 PM, you wrote:
MH> Does it make any sense using commit-option A with "Instance Per
MH> Transaction" container (a.k.a optimistic lock policy)?
A small note: Instance Per Transaction doesn't mean an optimistic
locking policy will be used. The default
Hello Nicholas,
could you be more specific?
do you mean the field should be updated by the db?
alex
Monday, January 06, 2003, 2:18:50 PM, you wrote:
N> How can I define a CMP2 field to only persist in
N> UPDATEs and not the initial INSERT ?
N> Thanks.
N> //Nicholas
N> =
N> Nicholas White
Hello Phuwarin,
'GROUP' is a reserved word. You shouldn't use it for column/table
names.
alex
Monday, January 06, 2003, 12:40:27 PM, you wrote:
PSsc> I'm encounter problem with unable to insert data to database with this
PSsc> error message.
PSsc> 17:15:42,373 ERROR [Test1EJB] Could not creat
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 4:01:53 PM, you wrote:
JOCxd> Alex,
JOCxd> Let me repeat what I think happens during entity bean creation:
JOCxd> In ejbCreate we set all primary key fields.
JOCxd> In ejbPostCreate we can set up any CMR fields.
Yes
JOCxd> Any CMR fields set in ejbCrea
Hello Frank,
see my answer below.
Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 2:06:52 PM, you wrote:
LF> I have two beans Feature and FeatureOption with CMR.
LF> JBoss-HEAD created the tables correct, using the new feature to have the
LF> same field as FK to parent and part of PK:
LF> create table feature
Monday, December 30, 2002, 3:50:11 PM, you wrote:
PK> Are there any plans to support it?
Yes.
alex
PK> It would solve many problems (especially performance and lock problems
PK> in my application)
PK> -Original Message-
PK> From: Alex Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
mary key, like in
LF> Bean3 (febdr), the foreign key field must not be CMP-Field in the bean.
LF> It's automatically added because of CMR.
LF> As said, I would like jboss to recognize that the field already exists
LF> also in case of Bean3 and use this field for CMR.
LF> Fr
ment.
LF> The field festa_serial is mentioned twice here.
LF> I would like JBoss to recognize that the CMR-Field is already there as a
LF> CMP-Field in both cases.
LF> So my question: Is this a Bug, a FeatureRequest or a must be which will
LF> not be changed ?
--
Best regards,
Al
Thursday, December 26, 2002, 10:34:54 PM, you wrote:
DH> Using the Version Strategy as an example, if you have one app
DH> server talking to one database (equiv to commit-option B), will
DH> this make mostly-read transactions better or not make that much of a
DH> difference?
Actually, this is what
DJ> Just to make sure I understand: I think this relies on the database
DJ> transaction isolation level to be read committed or weaker?
Yes, currently, to be consistent, the tx level should be read committed.
I am thinking about the case of read uncommitted. Suppose, one tx
modified entity. Ano
DJ> I don't understand how this works yet. I'd really appreciate a detailed
DJ> explanation of what happens when 2 threads/transactions simultaneously
DJ> access one entity. I'd like to know what state the jboss "entity values"
DJ> are in and what state the database is in at all points of such an
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
