[JBoss-user] 2.4.1 default use Local Interface?

Hi Does JBoss 2.4.1 default use Local Interface even you specified an remove interface? I met a bug and I suspact that was the case, and I did a little test like this. === my Code === IBlsModel model = m_modelHome.findByPrimaryKey(new

RE: [JBoss-user] 2.4.1 default use Local Interface?

Is This also true if I use inJVM tomcat and called from the servlet side? thanks david -Original Message- From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:37 PM To: David You; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] 2.4.1 default use Local Interface? I

RE: [JBoss-user] Stateful session remove?

: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2001 04:00 An: 'David You' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Betreff: RE: [JBoss-user] Stateful session remove? Same problem here - started as on 2.4.0. Does not happen all the time, seems to be some sort of synchronization issue between the LRUEnterpriseContextCachePolicy

[JBoss-user] Local Interface?

I remember someone said JBoss had already supported LocalInterface? I tried on 2.4.1 and it got me errors: Any Ideas? thanks david = Bean : SequenceSession Section: 6.10.6 Warning: A session bean's home interface must extend the javax.ejb.EJBHome inter face.

RE: [JBoss-user] Local Interface?

Yeah, I did it wrong on ejb.xml. and I fixed it. then the context lookup failed. Says not bounded. Then I saw the email say only in 3.0. Stoped there. david -Original Message- From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 PM To: David You Cc

RE: [JBoss-user] Tradeoffs between Tomcat/JBoss vs. Tomcat/hancoded?

print when doing EJB design. David -Original Message- From: David M. Karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Tradeoffs between Tomcat/JBoss vs. Tomcat/hancoded? David == David You [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

[JBoss-user] JMS Resource Exception

Hi, I am using JMS as an Resource with JBoss version 2.4.1. And I am getting an exception: Any Ideas? thanks david Exception=== [Default] FINE: created connection: org.jboss.mq.SpyXAConnection@273d30 [Default] FINE: xaQueueSession: org.jboss.mq.SpyQueueSession@108727

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS Resource Exception

Figured out what's wrong. Some how the persistent directory is messed up. after delete the DAT0 files under jbossmq directory and restarted the server. It work just fine. thanks david -Original Message- From: David You Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:21 PM To: JBoss User List

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS Resource Exception

There is still something wrong with it. Everytime after I shutdown the server, I have to manually delete the DAT0 files. Otherwise it just went crazy after it restarted. regards david -Original Message- From: David You Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:21 PM To: JBoss User List Subject

RE: [JBoss-user] Tradeoffs between Tomcat/JBoss vs. Tomcat/hancoded?

I did both. Here are some experience. Tomcat/handcoded: Good performance(no RMI call), Do Database update yourself only when needed. Handling caching yourself..good or bad depends on what your programs look like. very difficult to do long transaction handling. Easy Unit Testing. Tomcat/JBoss

[JBoss-user] Stateless Session Bean pooling in JBoss?

Is Stateless Session Bean reused in JBoss? I am asking this this Because I noticed my stateless session's ejbCreate got call twice when the first time I invoke it.(Before and after). and the following call only called it after the EJB has been invoked. why it always got called after? I have not

[JBoss-user] article

Title: Re: [JBoss-user] transactions and isModified method HI, does anyone remember the link about the article about application server clusting from a people from Infogain? My machine was attacked by virus. and lost the link. Could somebody send again? you can send to my email address only