Bill
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Michael Stanley
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:56 AM
To: 'JBoss Users (E-mail)'
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction
Isolation levels
Where can I configure default transaction isolat
Bill
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Michael Stanley
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:56 AM
To: 'JBoss Users (E-mail)'
Subject: [JBoss-user] Transaction
Isolation levels
Where can I configure default transaction isolat
Where can I configure default transaction isolation levels?
- Mike
EJBQL doesn't support string_expressions (a.k.a input parameters) in
LIKE statements. A string_literal is a hardcoded 'string'. This is a
huge limitation to EJBQL, and as I understand it EJB 2.1 spec has this
feature added.
It is also my understanding that JBossQL supports this, along with t
> jboss 3.2 and 4 and possibly 3.0.2 all use xerces by default (and probably
> won't work with Crimson). If 3.0.2 uses Crimson by default you can put the
> Xerces jars in lib (NOT server/[config]/lib) and start with ./build.sh -j
> xerces.
Thanks...
I have it working now. Here was MY problem..
Has anyone had any luck setting up Jboss to use Xerces v2 as their
default XML parser?
Has anyone set up Oracle 9i DB as the default data store for CMP beans?
Seeking sample configuration ...
Thanks in advance.
--
---
This sf.net email
What is the reasoning to make depends a full ObjectName? Why not
support the use of a pattern?
**This also relates back to the use of semantic names instead of
ObjectNames. Depending on Semantic Names (or Role) rather than the
implementation.
--
-
I Agree 100%
Symbolic names are definitely a good idea.
Mike
Scott M Stark wrote:
> Yes that is correct. Changing one name in a well known file
> vs changing 20 names, several of which where in archives
> is a lot easier. Come on, the time you spent fixing the testcases
> would have been at lea
Scott M Stark wrote:
> How is that, a bug?
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[E
ginal Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean interfaces to EJBs
>
>
>
>>I'm currently building a system that requires plugi
ll is an example of how
Xdoclet is used to merge responsibilities defined in the spec)
In the end, I feel that this is just one of those things, that should
behave according to the spec.
Mike
>
> david jencks
>
> On 2002.07.30 17:27:02 -0400 Michael Stanley wrote:
>
>>
hen you can through the error, but I think making it
>>mandatory in the config file isn't neccessary.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Scott Stark
>>>Chief Technology Officer
>>>JBoss Group, L
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean in
down the
> configuration for a single mbean in a configuration file without knowing
> its object name?
>
> david jencks
>
> On 2002.07.30 16:23:02 -0400 Michael Stanley wrote:
>
>>>Yes, depends has to be an ObjectName and it cannot have a pattern.
>>
>>hmm
xxx
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxxxxxx
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:40 AM
> Subject: Re:
dynamic mbean
> associated with an ejb in the next draft.
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxxxxxx
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
c mbean
> associated with an ejb in the next draft.
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxx
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
lement the postRegister methods as I
mention below.
Mike
Michael Stanley wrote:
> First let me thank you for your help.
>
>
> I'm still a little confused.
>
>> Create your own mbean that simply invokes methods on the
>> EJB through its remote or local interfaces.
>
hnology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean
Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:57 AM
> Subject: [JBoss-user] MBean
What is the best approach to adding MBean interfaces to your ejb's?
More importantly, is there a way to have these MBeans registered
automatically on ejb deployment?
Thanks,
--
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading o
ent implementation
classes then it should be added to the classpath by default. Or am I
missing something?
Mike
Michael Stanley wrote:
> I'm attempting to write an MBean that queryies the MBeanServer for
> ObjectNames, based on a QueryExpression. I have the following block of
>
I'm attempting to write an MBean that queryies the MBeanServer for
ObjectNames, based on a QueryExpression. I have the following block of
code in my class ->
*** Code Snipet ***
QueryExp query = Query.and(
Query.match(Query.attr("EJBModule"),
Query.value("*")
),
Query.m
t.java
> DistributedStateImplMBean.java
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxxxxxxxxxx
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: F
JBoss is heirarchial. Jboss initializes it, and therefore your logging
messages would utilize there root category appenders. This is
configured in the /server//conf/log4j.xml
file, where instance is (out of the box) either all, default, or
minimal. If your running out of the box then its de
Hello again. Well after scratching my head for a long long time, it
appears to me like the MainDeployer is contains arguments or return
methods that aren't serializable and thus causing the Notificaiton
object to throw a RemoteException (really a wrapped MarshelException).
In my previous emai
Well, I'm still attempting to recieve notifications on EJB Deployment.
After looking into this for a long time, I felt the best way was to use
the MEJB event notification as specified in the JSR-77.
Here's the story.
- I wrote the NotificationListner, which implements
javax.management.Notific
Hi, I'm interested in getting deployment notification messages from the
EJBDeployer. I would like to recieve messages containing the JNDI of
the recently deployed/undeployment EJB. I'm not sure the best way to do
this.
I'm rather new to JMX, and JBoss, but I understand the general
principal
28 matches
Mail list logo
