Hi,
Is it possible that kernel invokes start() method of my Mbean without invoking
create() method.
Both start() and create() are exposed in the xmbean file.
-A
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834904#3834904
Reply to the post :
http://
That worked.
Thanks
-A
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834387#3834387
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834387
---
This SF.Net email i
Here is the ant task
target name="xmbean"
taskdef name="jmxdoclet" classname="xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask"
mkdir dir="xdoclet"
jmxdoclet destdir="xdoclet" excludedtags="@version,@author"
fileset dir="${src.dir}"
include name="**/*.java"
Hi,
I have added the xdoclet tags (like @jmx:mbean) in my java code and am trying to
generate the xmbean files using the following ant task.
The above ant task does not throw any error (even in debug mode
Thanks. That was what I was looking for.
-Aseem
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834059#3834059
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834059
---
Thanks for the reply.
Is this the only way to resolve the dependencies? In this case, a service has to
expose getter/setter methods just to resolve the dependencies of dependents.
Is not there any componentRegistry in JBoss which maintains a mapping of objectName Vs
objects.
-Aseem
View th
Hi,
I am looking for a way in which my mbean can retieve its dependent objects.
It seems that in the xml, I can specify my dependencies and container passes
that objectname (via a setter) in my Mbean. From there how can my mbean
retrieve the dependent object instance without using dynamic proxy.
