Hi Thomas,
That is pretty much the path I am heading down. I just wanted to make sure
there was not a cleaner "easier" approach.
Thanks,
Chris
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3868381#3868381
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.htm
We have different clients that require different authentication sources. For
instance, our external clients user/pass are kept in a DB whereas our internal
user/pass are kept in ActiveDirectory. I would like to extend the security
layer of jboss to use the "client type" to decide which security
Also,
It was a typo. However, the rmic that I used to generate the same repository id
that janeva is using was from the 1.4.2_05 jdk - which is the same JDK that
jboss is running against. That doesn't make sense. So Janeva is using the
proper one at compile time, but it may be the one that is us
Thanks for the clarifications Francisco. The post was due to a lack of
knowledge in the IIOP area. I am using 1.4.2_05 - but maybe Janeva isn't. I
will investigate further.
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864637#3864637
Reply to the po
Verified - this is definitely fixed in 3.2.7
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864272#3864272
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3864272
---
The overloaded method bug is fixed in 3.2.7 but the repository ids are still
invalid.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864271#3864271
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3864271
--
Ignore the fact that the package name for ListFilter in the jboss generated
method is org.twia.util --> it should read org.foo. I edited the package name
when posting but forgot to update the jboss one
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864148#38
I think there is a bug in the way that Jboss generates IIOP IDL repository ids.
Rmic and Janeva both generate the same repIds but Jboss is using something
different. That leads me to believe its a Jboss bug.
For some class Insured...
rmic and janeva both generate the following valid IDL id
RMI
Setup
-
* WindowsXP
* Sun1.4.2_05
* JBoss3.2.3
* Janeva invoking JBoss via IIOP
I am getting a marshal exception when I call a session bean over iiop from my
Janeva client. The object that I am passing in was previously unmarshalled on a
previous successful call.
Example:
Nice -- I will try it out.
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864192#3864192
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3864192
---
This SF.Ne
I think there is a bug in the way that jboss generates IIOP method names for
remote interfaces w/ overloaded methods.
I have the following ejb remote interface
public interface ApplicationSession extends EJBObject {
public Application getApplications(org.foo.ListFilter filter)...
public A
I did just verify that this is resolved in 4.0.1. I know that was well-known
but I just wanted to wrap this post off w/ a sanity check.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3863104#3863104
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
I still experienced the same issue on 3.2.7RC1 --
"Class xxx already has TypeCode".
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3862953#3862953
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3862953
How many other iiop issues were fixed from 3.2.3 to 3.2.7RC1? I am trying to
decide whether to bump up or not. The fix above is a simple 2 liner in
InterfaceRepository and ContainerImplDelegate but I would rather not have to
maintain that myself. If it were up to me I would jump to 4.0x :)
Is
Thanks for the info Adrian. I am trying to find a concise list of release notes
for changes between 3.2.x and 4.0.x but all I seem to come up w/ is changes
between 4.0.xa and 4.0.xb. I am trying to make an argument for upgrading to 4.0.
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/inde
So I have tracked this down to what I think is a bug in the iiop registry
implementation. I think it is too strict.
Suppose the following:
class A extends B {
}
class B implements java.io.Serializable {
private A[] theAs;
...
}
During the mapping process of A all of its refernced types ar
This is not a bean. Its a POJO thats referenced by a bean. Where did you get
anything about serialization? The class is properlly serializable. The
exception is saying that JBoss does not support inner classes in iiop. My
question was does jboss support inner classes in iiop -- not how do I do
I know that 3.2.x doesn't support CSIv2. But I believe that 4.0.x does -
correct? We are stuck on 3.2.3 for now. I am using IIOP.NET to connect a C#
client to our secured ejbs (and there lies the problem). I need to somehow get
security working. I know I can write an EJB interceptor that extract
WindowsXP
Sun1.4.2_05
JBoss3.2.3
I am deploying an ejb that has a reference to a POJO. The POJO extends another
POJO that extends another POJO.
The deployment is failing w/ the following message at deploy time. Any ideas as
to what is causing this? Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 2005 12:35:12
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:15 PMPost subject: Inner classes
I have a value class that has an inner class. The deployment of ejb fails due
to this. Where can I find a list of supported/unsupported types and
So if you have an ejb client in the web tier that is doing a manual login and
using LoginContext("client-login",..) w/ the default configuration of
ClientLoginModule w/ multi-threaded=false you will need to switch the
multi-threaded to true so that each thread has its own values in
SecurityAsso
Background:
I am integrating a .NET->Java bridge into a J2EE app. The bridge has a webapp
that listens for TCP/binary connections from the .NET proxies. On every request
the user/pass is sent. I need to extract these values and manually log into the
container on every request. N
22 matches
Mail list logo
