Thanks a lot.
I'll have a look to hibernate tool right now.
Christophe.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3926732#3926732
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3926732
Hi,
i have A relation table between 2 object A and B, each has one id idA and idB
In an existing model i have a relation table to associate object A and B with
some other information (asootiation date, etc...).
So the AB table is :
idA long
idB long
createDate Date
...
...
It's primary key is a
hi
in this part of code :
...
FleetUser fu = (FleetUser) QueryUtils.getNamedQuerySingleResult(em,
FleetUser.findFleetUserForFleet.indexed, fleet);
em.remove(fu);
em.flush(); // HAVE TO FLUSH HERE
FleetUser newFu = new FleetUser(fleet, user);
fleet.setIsManaged(true);
em.persist(newFu);
No one to help on this ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3925780#3925780
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3925780
---
This SF.Net email is
wereldkeuken wrote : I don't see the reason why you use @JoinTable for a
onetomany relationship? This is meant for a manytomany relationship no?
Yes it is. But i am actually coding my EJB3 code for an application, but i have
to use the old Datamodel in place.
So i have no choice for the moment.
Hi.
I have the following exception when using a @JoinTable with a @ManyToOne
relation :
org.hibernate.cfg.NotYetImplementedException: association table on a single
ended association is not yet supported
I know that a many-to-one relation doesn't need a join table to be done, but we
had to
epbernard wrote : that you cannot yet map a many to one association using an
association (join) table
Sorry i've just post a similar question.
But is it definitive or will it be possible in the future ?
is it part of the EJB3 specs or a limitation of hibernate ?
Thanks.
View the original post
PS: i was able to map ManyToOne relation with an external table in EJB2.1.
EJB3 does not permit that anymore ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3925571#3925571
Reply to the post :
Hi,
me again.
A have some issues with an unidirectional @OneToMany relation
Here are the code and results :
Entity bean
@Entity
@Table(name = MANAGER)
public class Manager implements Serializable {
protected Collection managedFleets;
Thanks, but i couldn't find anything about the @Fetch annotation and how to use
it.
It doesn't seem to be part of the ejb specs. Is it a specific Hibernate tag ?
Could you give me a link or a piece of example ?
Thank you.
Christophe.
View the original post :
I didn't find it anymore too.
But i still can obtain a reference to the Session context with :
public class MyInterceptor {
@Resource
protected SessionContext sessionCtx;
.
@AroundInvoke
public Object aroundInvoke(InvocationContext invCtx) throws
Hi.
Is it possible to instanciate some object in an interceptor and passing it to
the current session bean method ?
I tried to use the InvocationContext with the
InvocationContext.getContextData().put(MyKey, MyValue).
But actually i can only use this InvocationContext in others interceptors.
Is
Thanks, it works fine with this trick !
But is it the only way to do that ?
If a chain of interceptor are sharing and adding some information to the
contextData of an InvocationContext, each of them (or the last one) should
store the contextData in a ThreadLocal for the session bean ?
In this
Hi,
i'm using some entities with a lot of relations and tagged them with the LAZY
FetchType.
So i decided to use masks to load the needed relations from a session bean.
See below :
public Account loadRelations(int mask) {
Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(this.getClass());
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : look at the tutorial eamples. EJBNAME/remote
Seems that with the new jboss4.0.4RC1 the lookup need to be
EAR File name withour .ear extension/BEAN NAME/remote
Why do all the binding start with the EAR name ??
View the original post :
15 matches
Mail list logo
