I guess, that depends on your JDK/JSSE ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956361#3956361
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956361
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web servi
Nope. On standard bourne shells "${HOSTNAME}" == "$HOSTNAME" is always true.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956276#3956276
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956276
Using Tomcat but need to
com.ehsbe.commons.common.Misc;
|
| /**
| * @author Jens Elkner
| * @version $Revision$
| */
| public class CaHandler
| implements X509TrustManager
| {
| private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory
| .getLogger(CaHandler.class);
| private static X509TrustManager
Yes, setting up a suitable X509TrustManager (+ see SSLContext) is a much better
hint ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956028#3956028
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956028
Using Tomcat
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : ... you need to "Trust all certs" when you setup
the connection programmatically
Well, why do you need SSL, if you trust all certs? Definitely a "no master"
hint ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955938#3955938
R
/usr/apps/jdk1.6/bin/java -server -Xms128m -Xmx128m
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=360 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=360
-Dprogram.name=run.sh
-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,address=8000,server=y,suspend=n
-Djavax.management.builder.initial=org.jboss.system.server.jmx.MBeanServer
Not sure, what the real problem is, however, if I start Jboss 4.0.4GA with
mustang instead of tiger, everything runs fine except the JMX console. Because
of a "com.sun.management:type=HotSpotDiagnostic is not registered" exception
the complete jmx-console is unusable.
I made the following fix:
Hmmm, @Service seems still quite bogus wrt. Permissions.
1) The problem above described in the first posting is still not resolved.
2) When calling a method of the bean from a servlet (which needs no
authentication)
one gets an authentication exception even if the whole bean is annotated
wi
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Just to review, this error only happens when using
jdk 1.6, but works with jdk 1.5, right?
Yepp.
anonymous wrote : I can make the update to use the other forName() method
signature as you mentioned, but only problem is that current code base is for
2.0.0 release, whic
OK, thanx.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951850#3951850
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951850
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.s
OK, Thanx! Going to bed now as well, otherwise I'll probably loose the path as
well ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951576#3951576
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951576
OK, just to give it a try (usually I wanna use/test officially realeased as) I
downloaded and installed the 1.0.1. As I already guessed, it doesn't fix the
problem, since JBoss Serialization is not used. Still need to use my patched
version of jboss-remoting.jar ...
View the original post :
h
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : The Bug I was talking about was identified on every
JVM
At least it is consistent than ;-)
anonymous wrote : Bugs happens ;-) (even with the JDK)
Yepp ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951571#3951571
Reply to the p
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : You could or upgrade JBoss to 4.0.4.SP1
Hmmm, can't find 4.0.4SP1 on sf.net (only the GA). Is there a hidden place,
where one can download it?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951570#3951570
Reply to the post :
http
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : There is a bug with JBoss Serialization 1.0 about
arrays.
Hmmm, as far as I can see, JBoss Serialization is not used. I digged a little
bit around, found the source for
org.jboss.remoting.loading.ObjectInputStreamWithClassLoader (I think in the
1_4_1 branch) and repl
Is it possible to provide the sources for the jboss-remoting.jar, which comes
with 4.0.4GA?
Without it it is really a pain/impossible to debug ... :(
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951556#3951556
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/inde
I wanna test (and actually really wanna use) 1.6 with my EJB3 standalone
clients. Unfortunately it seems to be impossible dueto a serialization problem:
23:19:40,103 [Thread-4] ERROR (SocketClientInvoker.java:293) - Got marshalling
exception, exiting
| java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: [Ljava.
Thanx william,
but somehow it doesn't work or I replaced the wrong line. I guess, you ment the
2nd bind entry in the "Service Bean" domain element (for my version 4.0.4GA
vanilla this is line 330)?
Do you need the complete stack trace ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html
Is it possible, that @Service is still not completely fixed wrt. Permissions ?
E.g.:
@Service
| @SecurityDomain("shared")
| @RunAs("staff")
| -- log --
| 2006-06-15 23:58:30,355 WARN
[ScannerThread:org.jboss.system.ServiceController:515] - Problem stopping
service
jboss.j2ee:ear=freddy
I'm currently trying to fix jboss to allow naming + ejb3 transport completely
via http[s] and to get it working via tunneled connections.
The problem I see is, that InvokerLocator always tries to resolve the host to
an inetAddress/its own hostname in the constructor. This IMHO not very useful,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : The ejb transport is independent of the naming
service transport.
|
OK, but it is involved/used to create the InvokerLocation for the ejb
transport. That's what I wanna tweak wrt. the request.
anonymous wrote : The ejb remote binding being looked up has to be confi
Hi,
just tried to tunnel jnps via ssh and found out, that it seems to have real
security issues:
1) the initial context lookup is done via https, ok
2) but any consecutive ctx.lookup is done via plain http://{serveraddr}:80/...
3) every ejb3 invocation is done via a plain aka unencrypted
socke
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote :
| - I actually (as a programmer) would recommend to not use SimpleDateFormat
unless your formatting is stored in a database field since its performance is
pretty bad.
Hmmm, would say, that depends. Its probably not as fast as Integer.toString(),
but IMHO its stil
Here an example, which I usually place directly into the
$jboss/server/$instance/deploy/ directory:
|
| TestDS
| jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/test
| com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
| test.dba
| test
| false
| true
| conv
You already tried:
convertToNull
|
or something like that ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3944361#3944361
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3944361
Emmanuel,
I do not understand your comment on EJBTHREE-425 aka why you rejected it?
Is it possible to explain a little bit more?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3941452#3941452
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=po
And oracle has more than one dialect as well - be warned ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3941012#3941012
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3941012
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=FromJBossEJB3.0RC3ToRC4PFD
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3937523#3937523
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3937523
-
"lhoriman" wrote : Why would you ever want a bean with identical Local and
Remote interfaces?Because I wanna make sure, that at the server the method
params are passed as reference and thus avoid the serialization overhead ... ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb
Did you give @EmbeddedId a try ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3935738#3935738
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3935738
---
This SF.Net
How about @Service + @Management and putting the "init my app" stuff into the
start() method (having that in the spec would be really cool)?
OK, there is still the permission issue wrt. @RunAs, but AFAIK it is already
fixed in CVS (but not in CR2 :-(()...
View the original post :
http://www.j
Perhaps 'interval' is a reserved word within mysql ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3935074#3935074
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3935074
Wondering, what those "j2ee rules" are ... ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3934838#3934838
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3934838
--
Any experience/hints, whether @EmbeddedId or @IdClass should be used wrt.
better performance?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3933883#3933883
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3933883
---
Thax a lot. Hope it doesn't take too long ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3933570#3933570
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3933570
---
Thanx for the info. Unfortunately I need start() and stop() to fire up/cancel
timer threads :(
BTW: What are your estimations? Is it possible to have it fixed in RC2?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3933500#3933500
Reply to the post :
http://w
Enable the log trace level for org/jboss/security/auth/spi . Perhaps it queries
for something else ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3933395#3933395
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3933395
Was slightly faster: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-491 ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3933279#3933279
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3933279
Is this bean (@Service + @Management + @Remote + @SecurityDomain) possible ?
For my case, @Service + @Management + @Remote works, but as soon as I add
@SecurityDomain (since I do not want, that unauthenticated users are allowed to
invoke service methods), I get an exception like:
2006-03-28 00:
For test environment OK. But for production (i.e. when I'm sure, everything is
fine), I do not want to have a ... fetching something from somewhere (even if
it is a schema, only) and slowing down the things by validating already
validated stuff ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com
Hmm, already fixed that stuff and have no ex. handy anymore. If I'm remember
correctly, I created a Thread (more or less long running task) from within a
bean and within the thread I got an NPE ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3932637#39326
Or just to switch validation off ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3932603#3932603
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3932603
---
This SF.Ne
http://docs.jboss.org/ejb3/app-server/HibernateEntityManager/reference/en/html_single/index.html#transactions-optimistic
http://docs.jboss.org/ejb3/app-server/HibernateEntityManager/reference/en/html_single/index.html#transactions
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb
Hmm, actually I expected to see the Airline class. But anyway, the IDE issue
might be an outdated ejb3.api beeing used. The other thing you have to find out
by yourself. Just mimic the spec example and if it works, start modifying it
;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.htm
Not sure, what you are trying to accomplish with it, however, where do you
know,
1) that's the EM has only ONE instance of an SLSB?
2) that there is only one EM, which "manages" the SLSB?
3) that not another instance of something accesses your bean from within
another ClassLoader?
4) Scaleabili
Rough guess:
@EmbeddedId
What tables do you expect to join ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3931843#3931843
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3931843
---
"binario" wrote : I think this is a TERRIBLE design flaw.
Hmm, IMHO this is better, than blowing up the required code and introduce a
more or less big performance problem and other trouble.
anonymous wrote : it should be documented CLEARLY.
Yepp. +100
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
Well, at least if you use a kind of optimistic locking via @Version one of both
should fail and the failed transaction should be rolled back (of course only,
if your are not chomping the Exceptions, which automatically trigger the
rollback ;-)). Just make sure, that you call em.flush() after mer
@TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRES_NEW) ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3931558#3931558
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3931558
--
Found a solution by myself:
---
jboss-4.0.4RC1-src/system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/ServerImpl.java.orig
Mon Mar 20 23:38:02 2006
| +++
jboss-4.0.4RC1-src/system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/ServerImpl.java Mon
Mar 20 23:45:07 2006
| @@ -172,6 +172,16 @@
|// masqurade
"tromanowski" wrote :
| Is anyone that is using the current Jboss EJB 3.0 release building and
deploying an ear? Would you please post the structure of your ear?
foobar.ear
| foobar.ear!lib
| foobar.ear!lib/bar-if.jar
| foobar.ear!lib/bar-if.jar!META-INF
| foobar.ear!lib/bar-if.jar!ME
Hmm, just played around with some loggers and found out, that JBoss does not
set a DefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler (see
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(...)).
The problem here is, that if an exception is not caught (e.g. NPE), it leads to
the invocation of
ThreadGroup.uncaughtExcepti
Is there a property to set the default timezone to be used in the
persistence.xml?
My problem is, that I do not want to have to command a user, under which
timezone he has
to run its application server (since other apps my rely on a certain one).
However, the only reliable way to store dateti
Expected behavior: see PFD-Persistence page 38
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3929486#3929486
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3929486
--
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-438
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3928752#3928752
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3928752
--
Since no standard available, I use a much simpler approach, i.e. without a
callback handler or java.security.auth.login.config:
@Override
| public boolean authenticate(String name, char[] password, String[]
roleNames)
| throws Exception
| {
| if (roleNames
yes.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3925824#3925824
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3925824
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML,
Just to make sure: your enums are not annoted with @Embedded or something like
that, are they? For a shot into the blue, just remove all annotations from your
enum and check, whether it works...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3925588#3925588
R
Not sure, whether you put the right logs on the issue (it says somes bla at
linux, but the logs sees to come from windows). Anyway, I guess you missed to
post the important part - the log, which states, that the entity is not bound.
You should lookup your bean with $EARNAME/$beanname/local|rem
What I see is, that you wanna create a companies table with two columns with
the same name (CLIENTID), one is an long column (clientId) and the other is the
column with the FK to Clients.CLIENTID. So ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3925384#3
FYI: This is probably something one should know, if one uses tomcat:
anonymous wrote : Tomcat's classloader will still rudely null out private
fields on objects to
| which 'static final' references exist, but it will only do so if the
referred
| objects themselves were loaded by a webapp cla
1) Why are you annotating it with embeddable ?
2) Why do you overwrite the ordinal stuff ? Are you looking for trouble ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3924395#3924395
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod
My blobs work wo any problems (and did with the old notation in 4.0.3x) as
well. IMHO there is no need to wrap that array into something else:
@Lob @Basic(fetch=FetchType.EAGER, optional=true)
| @Column(name="image", length=262144)
| public byte[] getImage() {
|
This was a problem with 4.0.3SP1 (EJB RC3) - one had to use enumvar.ordinal().
The ordinal stuff however does not work anymore with 4.0.4RC1. So I removed
.ordinal() from all parameters and it works as expected.
So at least for me everything is fine with enums now (using MySQL 5.0.15,
connecto
see "9.1.19 Enumerated Values" in the Java Persistence API PFD
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3923778#3923778
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3923778
-
4.0.4RC1 comes with EJB 3.0 RC5.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3923646#3923646
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3923646
---
This SF.net
Another hint I got wrt. 440:
0 DEBUG [ main ] org.jboss.security.SecurityAssociation - Using ThreadLocal:
false
50 DEBUG [ main ] org.jboss.remoting.Client - invoke called, but our invoker is
disconnected, discarding and fetching another fresh invoker for: InvokerLocator
[socket://192.168.21.1:
But I think, I know why: The legacy db has no/does not support FKs.
Try the given example with mysql (I'm using 5.0.15):
USE test;
| DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `categories`;
| CREATE TABLE `categories` (
| `categories_id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
| `parent_id` int(11) NOT NULL defaul
OK, thanx for the enlighten me ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3923184#3923184
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3923184
---
This SF.ne
Does not help. Still the same problem.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3923183#3923183
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3923183
---
This S
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Guys,
| I need more information. I need a test case I can reproduce. Currently,
we cannot reproduce any of your problems.
|
Now I've found one too in an old app, which I'm currently converting to
4.0.4RC1. Reduced stuff looks like this:
| @Entity
| @Table(
E.g. because my EJBs use util classes, which are required on the rich client
(and in the feature possibly on the web app as well). Right now, I've to add
the util classes to the ejb.jar - otherwise I get ClassNotFoundExeptions when
invoking the beans.
OK, perhaps it might work to add a class-pa
Hmmm, is this (*.ear/lib/availableToAll.jar) on your roadmap for 4.x ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3923056#3923056
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3923056
-
Interesting.
Wondering, whether it would help in case 2), to create the query outside of
loop and just setting the id inside the loop via query1.setParameter("pid", id).
Also it would be interesting, how the second case looks, if you em.flush() at
the end of the loop (i.e. after clearing orders
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-438
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3923006#3923006
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3923006
--
Just saw the use case for em.getReference() in
HibernateEntityManager/reference/en/html/objectstate.html:
child = new Child();
| child.SetName("Henry");
| Parent parent = em.getReference(Parent.class, parentId); //no query to the
DB
| child.setParent(parent);
| em.persist(child);
My qu
Hmm, using 4.0.4RC1 I get always a NPE when I try to create an EM factory:
javax.persistence.PersistenceException: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.hibernate.ejb.Ejb3Configuration.createEntityManagerFactory(Ejb3Configuration.java:173)
at
org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistenc
Another one (since wiki does not work):
Rich clients will need jboss40/server/all/lib/jboss-serialization.jar (watch
out for exceptions wrt org.jboss.serial.io.JBossObjectOutputStream)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3922777#3922777
Reply to th
Perhaps it is worth to add them to the wiki or hibernate migration guide:
@Lob(fetch=FetchType.EAGER, optional=true, type = LobType.BLOB)
is now
@Lob @Basic(fetch=FetchType.EAGER, optional=true)
type (blob or clob) is determined automatically
Use @Interceptors(A.class...) instead of @Interceptor
Would should tell me the follwing:
2006-02-10 00:14:31,172 FATAL
[ScannerThread:org.hibernate.ejb.packaging.PersistenceXmlLoader:101] - $earname
JTA
No other WARN, ERROR around it. So should I assume, something is wrong (at
least logs look ok) or is it a just a kind of typo ?
env: 4.0.4RC1
V
OK, thanx!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3922754#3922754
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3922754
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Emmanuel,
is it leagal to use p.getMandant.getId() aka "native" PKs on lazy fetched
entities, or is it just an unreliable sideffect?
Asking because this would make caching on the client side for e.g. tree like
structures easier/less complex ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/i
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : flush() just calls JDBC updates, it doesn't commit.
Ahh, so I interpreted the spec not as assumed. OK, thinking a little bit more
about it, it is probably not so easy to rollback already db commited data ;-)
anonymous wrote : For transacted JMS use the "java:/JmsXA" f
See http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=76094
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3921580#3921580
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3921580
--
Is it possible, that in 4.0.3SP1 vanilla the entitymanager does not flush, when
em.flush() is called, but at the end of a JTA, only ?
My SLSB szenario:
C1:t0) remote client creates a new entity
S1:++t0) server em.persist(entity)
S2:++t0) server em.flush()
S3:++t0) server broadcast: new entity
S
Hmmm, since it seems to be impossible to persist and remove an entity within
the same JTA, I 'm trying to manage the tx manually, i.e. with tx1 persist and
within tx2 cleanup aka remove:
SLSB
...
| @PersistenceUnit(unitName="foo")
| EntityManagerFactory emf;
| EntityManager em;
Hmmm, is it not allowed to create and persist an entity and later to delete it
within the same JTA?
What I [need to] do is:
1) read the header of a file and [re]populate/merge in tree nodes
2) read the remaining part of the file and fill the tree nodes with
content/merge new content
3) finally r
No, I haven't since JBoss Team said, problems should be posted to discussion
forums first.
However, reproduction is easy:
1) Create an entity, which has a property represented by a lazy fetched
collection
2) Get the remote entity with the lazy collection (i.e. server side does not
fetch it)
Th
Actually there is already a hibernate-client.jar in jboss/client/. However,
this is not sufficient when using lazy stuff (because of the missing
hibernate*Proxy) and that's why you still need hibernate3.jar and may forget
hibernate-client.jar ... :(((
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.
dito!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3912218#3912218
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3912218
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splu
"oglueck" wrote : You can not make any code tamper-safe. All code you give away
is untrusted.
Hmmm, even not, if archives are signed ?
Actually my concern is not really reverse-engineering, but rather a way to
assure users, that they have the "right/original" archive.
View the original post :
persistence.xml:
conf/log4j.xml:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does this help ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3910065#3910065
Reply to the post :
Try to add to the keystore the certificate[s] of the CA,who signed the two
certs as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3907894#3907894
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3907894
--
I use usually a simpler approach:
public static InitialContext getInitialContext(...)
| throws NamingException
| {
| String trailer = ("http".equals(proto) || "https".equals(proto))
| ? "/invoker/JNDIFactory"
| : null;
perhaps log4j.xml:
|
|
|
gives you a little bit more information ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3902050#3902050
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3902050
echo -n "test" | openssl dgst -md5 -binary | openssl base64
does the same ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3900982#3900982
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3900982
-
Sorry, for forgetting to add that: authentication doesn't work. The log says:
2005-09-05 18:20:25,589 DEBUG
[http-0.0.0.0-8080-1:org.jboss.security.plugins.JaasSecurityManager:218] -
CallbackHandler: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 2005-09-05 18:20:25,589 DEBUG
[http-0.0.0.0-8080-1:org.jboss.security.plug
I want to use a DatabaseServerLoginModule instead of the UsersRolesLoginModule
for jmx-console authentication. However, this doesn't seem to work
(UsersRolesLoginModule does the job, but not DatabaseServerLoginModule).
the relevant part of my login-config.xml:
|
|
I've setup an application, which uses JMS Topics to inform stand-alone clients
about certain state change. So the client subscribe to the well known topic and
receive messages.
Now I want to secure the topic, so that authenticated clients are able to
subscribe to the topics, only. I've an appli
99 matches
Mail list logo
