[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Using CsIL

2006-06-08 Thread fawce
sorry, meant to say use externalizable to write your object into a byte message that you know how to decode on the client. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3949910#3949910 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Using CsIL

2006-06-08 Thread fawce
getObject is difficult, because you would need some explicit knowledge about the object being transferred in order to translate it from java to c#. I recommend either using xml + serialization to a string with a text message, or implementing externalizable in java and a corresponding constructor

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Using CsIL

2006-02-27 Thread fawce
I currently don't have plans to implement transactions. All I can suggest is contacting Hungary Networks (http://www.net.hu/english/). They also have commit rights for csil, and they might be available to implement this for you. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=b

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Using CsIL

2006-02-27 Thread fawce
csil doesn't yet support .net2, and hasn't been tested by us with it at all. We'll be porting csil to .net2 in the next 3-4 months. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3926678#3926678 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - messagecache and network failure

2004-06-16 Thread fawce
if this belongs in the dev list... thanks, fawce View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839002#3839002 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3839002 -

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Subscribe to JBoss MQ Topic from .NET client?

2004-06-16 Thread fawce
The csil client works well for subscribing to topics. The version in cvs right now can process messages quite rapidly, despite the overhead of encoding the jms messages into xml. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838990#3838990 Reply to the post