[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Read Only Entity Beans? Nasty SELECT FOR UPDATE.

Found it, sort of. The SELECT FOR UPDATE was being caused by he DB (Postgres). It uses a SELECT for UPDATE on Referential Integrity (RI) links. The has the side effect of an insert on (say) a transaction table to lock all related tables. The side effect of that is a SEVERE drop in throughput (

[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Read Only Entity Beans? Nasty SELECT FOR UPDATE.

All, At the DB, the EJB3 layer causes a SELECT FOR UPDATE on bunches of related lookup tables that do not need to be locked during a transaction on a (say) Transaction table. Throughput goes out the window when these lock are on these tables. Is there a way to get EJB3 to NOT use SELECT FOR

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: *-service.xml files not being loaded when inside ear

Oh, I forgot to add, the ear is an expanded dir structure, not a single ear file. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831732#3831732 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831732 ---

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - *-service.xml files not being loaded when inside ear

Hi All, I have placed a number of -service.xml service files in the root directory of a ear file. I notice that the -service.xml files are not loaded when they are inside the ear. The services work fine when under the jboss deploy directory and not in the ear. The jboss documentation suggest

[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Severity of JMX MonitorNotification

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820720#3820720 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820720 Thanks Juha, I figured this would be the approach. However, while JBoss group is busy re-implement

[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Calling invoke on MBean methods with simple type in sign

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820706#3820706 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820706 Cheers Adrian, Actually, I have found it is a little more than that. You must use Long.TYPE.getNam

[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Cannot extend JMX Monitor. 'package' visibility

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820303#3820303 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820303 Actually, the question is more like "how can I create a new JMX Monitor when I can't subclass the Moni

[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Listener removal on Broadcaster dereg

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820012#3820012 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820012 Hi All, Does the MBean server automatically remove all references to NotificationListener objects f

[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Listener removal on Broadcaster dereg

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820019#3820019 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820019 Answer is ... Yes, the MBean server will remove the NotificationListener listener entries from a No