"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Scott's follow up comment:
|
| To block the call, the deacklock problem would have to be revisted to
validate what is going on. There is a user forum post saying that we are
creating sfsb instances that end up being thrown away if the session is
activated so we
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Show the exception trace.
This is a very simple SFSB. I tested SFSB cache, so I put debug statements
into ejb/Create/Activate/Passivate/Remove callbacks.
It looks like AllowedOperationsAssociation assumes ejbPassivate is called on
home ?
Below the stack trace.
Hi,
I made some investigations of how EJB container together with LRU cache of SFSB
works and found out, that when calling a business method on passivated bean, a
new bean instance is created. That new bean instance is actually not used for
activation. Instead the old bean instance, if still e
Hi,
I have a question to calling getEJBObject from stateful bean instance.
If I understand EJB 2.1 spec. correctly it is allowed to call getEJBObject from
ejbCreate/Remove/Activate/Passivate. Calling this method is "disallowed in the
session bean methods in which there is no session object id
Hi,
I have the following problem:
I have en entity bean (TimezoneEntity) with id (Long - oracle sequence,
is primary key), name, symbol persistant fields and the following finder:
* @ejb.finder
* signature="java.util.Collection findBySymbol(java.lang.String symbol)"
* view-type="local"
*
