[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: Low CPU Utilization on Linux

2005-08-04 Thread gozilla
jizzoe What king of JVM are you running ? Aren't you running it in green thread mode ? Gozilla View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888453#3888453 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 ClassCastException on PortableRemoteObjec

2005-05-17 Thread gozilla
Yes, thats what happened. AFAIK, you have to force the pass-by-value semantics somewhere, but I don't remember where. As I already said, I wouldn't go that way, I would simply wipe the client jar. Cheers View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=387801

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 ClassCastException on PortableRemoteObjec

2005-05-16 Thread gozilla
tigerreef, I don't get your point about anonymous wrote : I don't see how this will work any other way with the deployment I want. Using the UCL is the way to avoid an 'ejbclient.jar', because the classes are found in the jar already. Just wipe it out. If you absolutely wants to have an ejbclien

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 ClassCastException on PortableRemoteObjec

2005-05-15 Thread gozilla
Hi tigerref, I thing the problems comes from the fact that the classes in question exist in two places in your EAR: once in the EJB jar and once in the war (WEB-INF/classes). anonymous wrote : Servlet>> o's CL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url=file:/C:/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp27550TS

[JBoss-user] [Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: method-permission problem

2005-04-05 Thread gozilla
Hi morenito9000 Something you could also have tried is to specify the wildcard permission after the other one. Order often made a difference in descriptors. Gozilla View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3872768#3872768 Reply to the post

[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Unable to use another partition name other than DefaultP

2004-10-12 Thread gozilla
Hi monocongo, You may want to try to 'JBossConfigurator' http://damon.sicore.org/blojsom/blog/default/Development/?permalink=jBossConfigurator.txt They did aextensive job at searching the places where to change partition names, etc ... I based my deployments on their job, it's working Cheers,

[JBoss-user] [Persistence & CMP/JBoss] - Re:

2004-06-08 Thread gozilla
Alexey, anonymous wrote : | read-only in jboss.xml has almost the same effect as running w/o transactions. Read-only instance is not associated with the transaction (hence, is not synchronized at commit), is locked only for the duration of the invocation, and is evicted from the cache at the

[JBoss-user] [Installation & Configuration] - Re: load-repository to a acheive ear isolation(deployment ba

2004-05-25 Thread gozilla
(re-post since it seems that there is a gap in the forum somewhere between the 21th and today) --- Hi davidmboon I think the problem comes from the fact that you are deploying your ears inside a subdirectory of the deploy directory 'lms'. Did you set the 'RecursiveSearch' attribute of the 'URLD

[JBoss-user] [Installation & Configuration] - Re: load-repository to a acheive ear isolation(deployment ba

2004-05-24 Thread gozilla
Hi davidmboon I think the problem comes from the fact that you are deploying your ears inside a subdirectory of the deploy directory 'lms'. Did you set the 'RecursiveSearch' attribute of the 'URLDeploymentScanner' mbean to true ? Otherwise, (and that's what looks like) JBoss treat the lms dire