Answers:
1.) JBoss will attempt to handle all of the connections via the connection
pool. But 2000 connections will most likely not be able to be handled and you
will start getting exceptions.
2.) Configurable
3.) Yes. You should always code for a possible connection timeout or failure.
4.) De
The new JBossWeb looks great in the webinar. But it does not explain how to
configure it to participate with existing application servers that are running
web applications that use ejbs.
We want to use JBossWeb as our "static content" server instead of using mod_jk.
How do we set the configur
I see the release version is out for JBossWeb. What I don't see is how it it
is configured to handle static content, etc. I watched the webinar, and they
talk about what it can do but not how to set it up.
Do you have any links? We want to use it to front our AppServer running on a
different
1.) "That's not the first time this question was answered" Yes, I agree.
But still never answered.
2.) "Google is our friend", but finding informaton on Google on this very
subject is not easy and never from the source - JBoss.
3.) "we have made tests and we have used several concurrent use
Hmmm... No response in over a week.
If people can say they can handle 1000s of concurrent users, why can't they
talk more about the hardware and configuration they are using.
Why are people so reluctant to speak about this... you would think they would
brag about it.
View the original post
Have you tried to front your JBoss with Apache and have Apache handle your
static content? That gave us a 30% improvment in concurrent users.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3941628#3941628
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?m
Scott, this is related to another post I have in these forums called "Expected
Concurrent Users on JBoss... Really..."
You said the "The jboss web site easily supported more than 1000 users on a
similar configuration. "
Are these concurrent users? And you said "easily", do you have a number be
Part of my original question was does fronting Tomcat with Apache really help?
And the answer is undeniably YES!
Before we moved anything to Apache, we load tested JBoss/Tomcat and tweaked its
settings. Moved Max Threads values and such. Exactly as described on multiple
forums. We tweaked
Thank you for the response.
I am trying to find out, on average, what people are getting in concurrent
usage. I completely understand you can create a bad system and get 1
concurrent user. Or you can create a great architecture and get 100x more. Or
you could have an application that doesn
Amazing... not a single person can give a clue as to what an acceptable range
is?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3940283#3940283
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3940283
-
We are trying to figure out what "range" we should be shooting for with
concurrent users on a system. Yes, I know, "it depends on your application
logic, your hardware, blah blah". But lets assume some things.
1.) Dell 2850 64 Bit Dual 3.0mhz with 6 Gigs RAM, SCSI hard drives
2.) CentOS 64 b
My experiences with JMS are lackluster when it comes to performance. We need
all of our queues to be persisted, so that slows us down a bit. And under
heavy load, the system can come to its knees.
Since the main reason for using JMS is to enable asynchronous processing, why
not drop JMS in fa
While not open source, here is a really nice free one. "Free" if you want to
monitor no more than 5 things. User interface is very nice.
http://manageengine.adventnet.com/products/applications_manager/monitoring-jboss.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=
Here is the scenario:
Background:
You have JBoss configured to handle a connection pool of 50 connections. JBoss
gets 2000 requests at the same time for a connection. Obviously, not everyone
will get a connection the first time because there are only 50, but it hands
out the 50.
Questions:
1
Yes, this would work. Any idea of how far down the road?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3927182#3927182
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3927182
---
If you have multiple clustered JBoss servers, that use a singleton service, and
load starts to get heavy on the single JBoss box that instantiated and
maintains that service, is there a way to distribute the load to other boxes?
Would we have to abandon the "singleton service" approach and try
SOLVED!
You do not need to modify your server.xml file. You need to include a
jboss-web.xml file in your project's WEB-INF directory that contains and empty
context-root.
Hope this helps someone.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876901#387690
I am trying to get my web application to be the one that loads when JBOSS 4.0
is running and you type something like:
http://myweb.com/
But I only see the JBOSS welcome page even though I have my webapp deployed. I
can see myweb when I do this: http://myweb.com/myweb/ but I want it to be at
Please read my response right after my posting. "Problem resolved". Thank you
anyway.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876892#3876892
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3876892
Everything was exactly the same , even the base JBoss version. What was
different was the jbossall-client.jar. Once those were in sync, it worked.
Problem resolved.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876202#3876202
Reply to the post :
http://
When running JBoss on the same computer I run my test program, I am able to
successfully do a lookup on a session bean.
When I move that project over to another computer running jboss, I am unable to
do the lookup and always get a socket timeout exception.
I am able to test jsp creation via the
Very interesting. I have found that the deployment problem has something to do
with the name of the abstract method I call on the concrete class from the
abstract class. In my example above, I use the onMessage(custom.Message
message) signature. That fails.
When I change the method name from
I too am having a similar problem. In the code example above, the ConcreteMDB
class contains an onMessage method that takes a javax.jms.TextMessage object.
In my case, I want the AbstractMDB to handle a javax.jms.ObjectMessage that
contains a non-JMS system message and pass that non-jms messag
23 matches
Mail list logo
