Jason,
I do have the jars in the task classpath
|
| !-- WSTools Classpath --
| path id=wstools.classpath
| fileset dir=${jboss.home}/client
| include name=activation.jar/
| include name=commons-logging.jar/
| include name=javassist.jar/
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBWSFAQClientJars
Thomas,
I did follow this wiki's instructions and I still get the error.
Ant Snippets
!-- WSTools Classpath --
!-- Define a taskdef
I am trying to the ant task wstools and getting the following error :
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/ConcurrentReaderHashMap
| at
org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1225)
| at
jboss-4.0.4.GA with jdk 1.5
Running WSTools from the command line , I get
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.jboss.ws.tools.WSTools).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
Exception in thread main org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: Failed
to
I recently migrated my project from Jboss 4.0.1SP1 to Jboss 4.0.2. I use the
hibernate.cfg.xml file to set the Hibernate Sessionfactory at startup. The log
shows the the factory does get bound in jndi. However when I try to retrive
the factory using jndi in the code , I get null.
Please
Can someone point me to the release notes for Jboss 3.2.5?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3840160#3840160
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3840160
I am running Jboss on a pair of Windows 2003 boxes and our ear file and exploded war
files are on a shared file server . I have added the shared folder to the
URLDeploymentScanner in jboss-service.xml. The ear file deploys fine. However the
exploded WAR structure on the file server fails to
I would also like to know when RC2 will be released.
Adrian , if you do not know the exact date, please say so and stop bieng
an arrogant jerk.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835224#3835224
Reply to the post :
