[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-05 Thread dhartford
Hey all, After going through all the posts, I'm still a little hazy on why I still can not setup simple load-balancing WITH sticky sessions based on the environment above (and also referenced the pay-for Clustering doc). 1. Is there a sticky_session or stickySession flag for mod_jk2 in the work

Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-05 Thread Vladyslav Kosulin
dhartford wrote: Hey all, After going through all the posts, I'm still a little hazy on why I still can not setup simple load-balancing WITH sticky sessions based on the environment above (and also referenced the pay-for Clustering doc). 1. Is there a sticky_session or stickySession flag for mod_j

Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-05 Thread Vladyslav Kosulin
Another note: which MPM does your Apache httpd use? Again, according to my experience, the default prefork MPM for UNIX/Linux does not support sticky sessions with mod_jk/mod_jk2. You should recompile Apache with worker MPM instead of prefork: ./configure --prefix=/opt/httpd-2.0.48 --with-mpm=w

Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-05 Thread Bill Burke
But what are advantages of modjk2 over modjk? modjk support sticky sessions at least with Tomcat. Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: Another note: which MPM does your Apache httpd use? Again, according to my experience, the default prefork MPM for UNIX/Linux does not support sticky sessions with mod_jk

Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-08 Thread Vladyslav Kosulin
Bill Burke wrote: But what are advantages of modjk2 over modjk? modjk support sticky sessions at least with Tomcat. I don't know ;-) I use mod-jk2 from beginning, and it works. Vlad Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: Another note: which MPM does your Apache httpd use? Again, according to my experience,

RE: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-08 Thread Sacha Labourey
er] [Clustering/JBoss] - > Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo > > Bill Burke wrote: > > > > > But what are advantages of modjk2 over modjk? modjk support sticky > > sessions at least with Tomcat. > > I don't kn

Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-08 Thread Vladyslav Kosulin
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vladyslav Kosulin Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo Bill Burke wrote: But what are advantages of modjk2 over modjk

RE: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo

2004-03-08 Thread Sacha Labourey
ECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - > Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo > > Sacha Labourey wrote: > > > Which OS do you use with mod_jk2? Linux? If yes, with > threading model? > > Yes, Red Hat 7.3/LinuxThreads. Apache