[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: EJB communication

2004-05-11 Thread gorano
Yes you are right, JBoss pass-by-reference if the remote interface is on the same machine, and this is particular to JBoss, as I understand it (I take my comment about performance loss back). However you might consider the following differences between remote and local: 1. No need to catch

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: EJB communication

2004-05-11 Thread darranl
anonymous wrote : you have a perfomance loss on using remote In what way? JBoss treats them in the same as local interfaces by default anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3834404#3834404 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: EJB communication

2004-05-11 Thread cari34
Thank you guys, It's greate. Cari. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3834439#3834439 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3834439 --- This SF.Net

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: EJB communication

2004-05-10 Thread gorano
Why not using local interfaces? If you have no intention to split your beans over different JBoss instances than you have a perfomance loss on using remote. /G View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3834382#3834382 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: EJB communication

2004-05-10 Thread sesques
Hi, Nothing to do, it is the standard behaviour. Pascal View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3834255#3834255 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3834255