[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Problem with EJB-QL and primary-keys

2005-10-11 Thread Oliver Roell
I suppose, there is no error in the EJB-QL, because I have tried the query SELECT OBJECT(p) FROM RecipePos AS p WHERE p.color = '999', and if there is no record with the color 999, the finder-method doesn't throw an exception. But when I create one record with color 999, the finder-method

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Problem with EJB-QL and primary-keys

2005-10-11 Thread Oliver Roell
I have solved the problem. One column in my table is named with count. Count is not a reserved word in EJB-QL, but it is reserved in SQL, and I have used it many many times before. After 14 years experience with SQL I fall into this simple trap. View the original post :

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Problem in EJB QL

2004-03-17 Thread loubyansky
You should use JBossQL instead with COUNT(customerinfo.id) a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3826153#3826153;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3826153Reply to the post/a

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Problem in EJB QL

2004-03-17 Thread darranl
You can not use SELECT COUNT(*) in EJB-QL a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3826156#3826156;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3826156Reply to the post/a

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Problem in EJB QL

2004-03-17 Thread loubyansky
You can but in EJBQL2.1. EJBQL2.1 is in 4.0.0DR3 now. If there is demand for it, it can be back ported to 3.2. Though, most of it is supported by JBossQL. a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3826162#3826162;View the original post/a a

[JBoss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Problem in EJB QL

2004-03-17 Thread darranl
hardik is using J2EE 1.3 not 1.4 a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3826164#3826164;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3826164Reply to the post/a ---