Yeah sorry, I'm doing that now as we speak. I don't mean to waste people's
time, its just I'm new to both EJB3 and JMX and have some preimplementation
nervousness that I'm not on the path to righteousness.
Thanks...hope this turns out right...
View the original post :
So wrap an ejb in a jmx service and experiment.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3933152#3933152
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3933152
---
A shameless bump! :-)!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3932876#3932876
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3932876
---
This SF.Net email is
lifecycle in JMX is a jboss specific addition. Since you already want to use
jboss specific extensions, why not @Service?
Add a start/stop method to your @Service's @Management interface and you are
ready to go.
View the original post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : lifecycle in JMX is a jboss specific addition.
I'm not following...(you mean JBoss Services and their design pattern?)
bill wrote : Since you already want to use jboss specific extensions, why
not @Service?
|
| Add a start/stop method to your @Service's
No, they have no relation. You can create an mbean that interacts with an ejb3
component and visa-versa, but it makes no sense to expose an ejb3 bean via jmx
because the lifecycles do not match.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3932621#3932621
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : No, they have no relation. You can create an mbean
that interacts with an ejb3 component and visa-versa, but it makes no sense to
expose an ejb3 bean via jmx because the lifecycles do not match.
Scott, first off, thanks for the response. I would like to explore this
Has anyone tried this? :-)! I'm going to attempt tonight but I would really
appreciate any input regarding these two technologies and how they relate.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3931466#3931466
Reply to the post :
