[JBoss-user] [Installation & Configuration] - Re: Licensing Question for Custom Login Module

2004-08-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You did not say you were extending AbstractServerLoginModule in the first post. You said you were copying the SecureIdentityLoginModule and possibly modifying that. If you just link against jboss code by extending it in the java class sense, this is not creating a derived work which requires you

[JBoss-user] [Installation & Configuration] - Re: Licensing Question for Custom Login Module

2004-08-25 Thread bdbogg
I just want to clarify to make sure... if I were to write a login module that extended one of the JBoss login modules (such as the AbstractServerLoginModule) and distribute this with a commercial application, the mods would need to be made available under LGPL. But if I were to write a login mod

[JBoss-user] [Installation & Configuration] - Re: Licensing Question for Custom Login Module

2004-08-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The LGPL license kicks in if you are redistributing jboss. If your not, the mods are irrelevent. If you are, the derived login module source should be made available under LGPL license. This can be done most simply by supplying the code as a patch to the sourceforge jboss project. If you can't d