I will give it a try without 1.
Thanks
L
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952225#3952225
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952225
___
JBoss-use
It is stored in the JSF ViewRoot attributes.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952209#3952209
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952209
___
JBoss-us
As we discussed, I can work around this for Session scoped SFSB's by using the
JBoss specific @CacheInfo annotation, setting the timeout to be the same as an
HttpSession.
But what about Application scoped SFSB's? We run into this same problem due to
the aforementioned reasons in this thread.
Thanks Gavin. Problem solved.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952138#3952138
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952138
___
JBoss-user mailing list
Of course the @Begin is what was missing. For some reason, when I read the
reference doc, I got the idea that it wasn't need when starting a "Push"-style
MVC page action!
Now that I read it again, I must say it was written properly :)
Thanks again,
Richard
View the original post :
http://www
Aw dang!
I used Confluence markup tags instead of the BBCode tags - now my post is more
difficult to deciper. :(
(Help still?)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952128#3952128
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=p
I'm very new to seam, jsf, ejb3... But I thought I could get the demo running
with the instructions provided. I'm having trouble with the Lab 3 Step 1. I
don't know where to put the @End, is this in the NewHotelAction class?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb
Thanks for considering it, Gavin.
However, I don't like it either because it doesn't fully solve the problem: in
the example above, the same class would be used as a Seam component in some
roles but not in others.
My suggestion: a "create" property in the @Role annotation (and in @Scope?).
Def
Ah, I have never actually figured out how to make urls without extensions work
in JSF. Not saying its impossible, it is something I don't know the answer to.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952095#3952095
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.c
I suppose I could let you write @Scope on a class with no @Name. Put it in JIRA
and I'll make a decision about that later. I don't love it, but maybe I can
grow to like it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952092#3952092
Reply to the post :
ht
You should definitely NOT have to do (1). The other steps should be enough.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952090#3952090
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952090
_
I don't see where you start the conversation.
Should perform() have an @Begin annotation?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952088#3952088
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952088
__
Well, I guess I'm just not quite convinced that this is always a misuse...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952072#3952072
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952072
__
Let me rephrase:
Is there a way to specify a default Seam scope for variables that are not Seam
components?
If not, can we turn it into a feature request?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952057#3952057
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.c
I had something similar where I wanted to reject (throw away changes that I
have made to entities without it being flushed/commited to the db).
In the end I had to do 3 things.
1. in persistence.xml I prevented hibernate from flushing:
|
2.1. I annotated my the SFSB to prevent transaction
"sbryzak2" wrote : Quite sure. I'm pretty sure that it was after CR3 that I
fixed a bug to do with the encoding of international characters. If you
download the latest release (or get the latest from CVS) it should fix your
problem.
Thank you for your quick reply, Shane. I tried Seam 1.0.1GA a
Thanks for you answer.
Yes Ido. I need exactly what you have described. I think it is quite common
scenario.
And how to be now?
With EntityManager.setFlushMode() we can set only
javax.persistence.FlushModeType.COMMIT
or
javax.persistence.FlushModeType.AUTO
I tried this:
| private Entity
Quite sure. I'm pretty sure that it was after CR3 that I fixed a bug to do
with the encoding of international characters. If you download the latest
release (or get the latest from CVS) it should fix your problem.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic
Maybe I am confusing some issues, but I often have this scenario:
a pageflow with branches, where users can create things that should be
available for selection within the pageflow, but it should still be possible to
cancel the whole thing or submit at the end.
The pageflow exercises the methods
SESSION scope is misused to do IPC in a standard way (It's the only way that
would work on any JSR168 portlet container).
There is no real logic for application session scope.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951944#3951944
Reply to the post :
"sbryzak2" wrote : I just tried it with some characters I copied from baidu.com
and it seems to work correctly. Which version of Seam are you using?
Thank you for your reply, Shane Bryzak.
I am using Seam CR3. I still cannot use chinese characters with Seam Remoting
examples. Are you sure that s
Yeah, I know. Now ... Sorry.
Since I'm a trainee who saw Java code in 2004 the first time and who's now
discussing in a foreign language about problems I never thought of it's OK I
think.
I always say: Mistakes are there to be made and to learn from.
Next time I run into an error I'll try to iso
This thread would have been much, much shorter if you wouldn't have been
talking about Tomahawk the whole time.
You should have simplified your problem down to the *minimum* you needed to
reproduce it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951936#39
Originally, I had actually planned a PORTLET_SESSION scope distinct from the
SESSION scope. But then from Roy I got the impression that use of the global
session scope was considered a Bad Thing. Perhaps we need to revisit that
discussion.
On the IPC stuff, it is an event architecture, and so i
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-270
I tested the original messages example (without tomahawk) introducing a
@DataModelSelectionIndex property. The deployment also failed. So I didn't
mention the tomahawk dataTable in this issue.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html
I don't see how this has anything to do with pageflow.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951932#3951932
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951932
__
just in time...
very well - now it works! great!...
With this listener element, I got a deployment error.
But - after changing in components.xml
|
to
|
I see what I expected.
Thanks a lot
/Tilo
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p
Would it make any sense if pageflow would somehow support this?
Maybe one could add an element where the transaction should begin / commit or
rollback and by default be suspended or something along these lines?
Is this a legitimate feature request?
thanks
ido
View the original post :
http://w
Yes in Portal per the spec there are 2 scopes of session, portlet and
application scope.
Currently in Seam we only support Portlet scope.
IPC is different, it doesn't have any context, it just trigger events that
other portlets are listening to.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com
yes, jsf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951925#3951925
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951925
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sou
Did you read my last post?
I don't see this anywhere in web.xml:
| org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951924#3951924
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod
OK. Which component? JSF?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951922#3951922
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951922
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBo
alright. Maybe the problem is my Filter. I have a (Authentication-)Filter
installed. If the branch
request.getRequestDispatcher(fwd).forward(request, response);
|
is being called, the NPE occurs. If the branch
chain.doFilter(request, response);
|
is being called, the
I have a roadmap item to look at integrating JBoss Portal's IPC stuff with
Seam. But I have not done any of the research I need to do to understand this
stuff properly yet.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951919#3951919
Reply to the post :
ht
then open a JIRA issue
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951918#3951918
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951918
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-
Hmm. I can determine the selectionIndex for my own. But as Seam is a framework
and those annotations are public they should work, even if I use both.
Additionally I think that the @DataModelSelectionIndex delivers the index more
efficiently than my workaround, which iterates the whole list search
It is not possible to get an NPE from that line of code unless you forgot to
start Seam. ie. you do not have SeamListener registered in web.xml.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951910#3951910
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html
okay thomas, you made me to proceed trying.
If I remove the element
|
|
|
org.jboss.seam.jsf.SeamExtendedManagedPersistencePhaseListener
|
|
it woks.
So, if this is the solution - what is the explanation?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/in
You should not use EntityTransaction in Seam. You should use JTA transactions,
just like all the Seam examples do.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951907#3951907
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
Oh yes, this will not work anymore, after the stuff I did to generalize the
databinding architecture (@DataModelSelection and @DataModelSelectionIndex are
now no longer handled by special code). You can have one or the other, but you
can't have both at the same time.
If this is really a problem
There is no good way to do this within the EJB3 spec unfortunately.
In Hibernate, the following should work:
from A a where day(a.datetime) = :day and month(a.datetime) = :month and
year(a.datetime) = :year
On a lot of databases, the following will also work:
from A a where date(a.datetime) =
| http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd";>
|
|
|
| /login.jsp
|
| kunde
| /home-kunde.jsp
|
|
| dekra-hv
| /home-dekra-hv.jsp
You need EJB 3.0 RC8.
Or install JBoss with the "JEMS Installer".
This is doc'd in the getting started guide and in the announcements above.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951900#3951900
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mo
There are two ways to achieve this. One is to use the Hibernate-specific
setting FlushModel.NEVER (or FlushMode.MANUAL).
The other way is to make sure that all requests except for the last request run
outside of a transaction context.
ie. use Tx.NOT_SUPPORTED
View the original post :
http://w
Gavin,
I'm having the same issues as Newlukai, and as this person stated it appears
somewhat random, but it related to the combination of @DataModelSelection, and
@DataModelSelectionIndex.
Below you will find three fragment; simplified code, modified component.java
from the seam project, and t
You can keep faces-config.xml
What's in your file ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951882#3951882
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951882
___
It seems to work now. After removing the file WEB-INF/faces-config.xml I can
see my pages.
But - does this mean that it is not possible to provide my application with an
individual faces-config? What if i need sth. like a custom validator...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.
I've found another workaround: Just remove the @DataModelSelectionIndex
annotation. Then you can remove the value attribute from the
@DataModelSelection and injection works.
So there seems to be a problem when someone uses both annotations
@DataModelSelection and @DataModelSelectionIndex.
View
The nasty thing about this problem is, that when I use the this workaround with
the value attribute bijection doesn't work anymore.
The only way to deploy my app is to use the value attribute with the getter
method (without get it doesn't work for me too). And when the app is deployed
and I clic
One more (in french):
June 28th JBoss User Group Paris
http://www.paris-jbug.org please register
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951866#3951866
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951866
I've got the updated registration example (with required="true" on the input
fields) and I'm still getting the exception described by Brian:
| javax.faces.FacesException: Error calling action method of component with
id _id0:_id9
| at
org.apache.myfaces.application.ActionListenerImpl.p
ok, with JEMS-installer 1.2.0-beta it works. I guess the jems package includes
the correct version of EJB3.
Thank you all
and best regards
- Denis
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951841#3951841
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/ind
Thanks Gavin,
That worked as well.
Now I just have to go away and work out the relationship between a conversation
context and the business process context so I know why it worked !
Cheers,
Simon
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951808#395180
Does not seem to have anything to do with Seam. Try the EJB3 forum.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951787#3951787
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951787
_
thanks for your quick response
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951784#3951784
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951784
___
JBoss-user mailing lis
I just tried it with some characters I copied from baidu.com and it seems to
work correctly. Which version of Seam are you using?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951778#3951778
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=
...and the keyword there is "JBoss EJB 3.0 RC8"
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951777#3951777
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951777
___
JBoss
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=84871
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951772#3951772
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951772
__
The reason why I am making it a Seam component is to specify the scope in one
signle place in the code.
If I don't make it a Seam component, then I have to specify the scope in every
outjection. This means that if I want to change the behavior it in the future
then I will have to change n place
Just don't make it a Seam component.
You can outject any object to a Seam context variable, not just Seam components.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951740#3951740
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=
Yes, this should work. (And I'm pretty sure it does. Step through Seam code in
your debugger to confirm for yourself.)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951739#3951739
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode
FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getApplication().createValueBinding()
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951738#3951738
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951738
_
I see from JIRA that this issue has been resolved.
Can somone tell me the correct way to make an object directly available to the
Http Session so that it can be accessed by a Servlet filter?
Ive tried:
| @Out(value="loggedInUser", scope=ScopeType.SESSION)
| private User loggedInUser;
|
Anyway I am going ahead with another seam component ProcessInitiator with the
target seam component injected (one which has process1, process2 etc).
So, I got a little facade which enhanced the design.
Thanks
Vamsi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic
Thank you, Thomas ! I reinstalled jboss.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951657#3951657
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951657
___
JBoss-use
Where and how can I send you my modified messages example?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951650#3951650
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951650
__
You need to install JBoss AS using the JEMS installer (or update the EJB3 libs
of your installed AS with libs from EJB3 RC8 but previous oprion is easier)
See the "Getting started" doc
http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbossseam/gettingstarted
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.htm
I meant the jboss-ejb3-all.jar, of course;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951637#3951637
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951637
___
JBoss-us
Hi,
the problem isn't solved. So I'm going to write a testcase. Any hints how such
a testcase should look like?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951631#3951631
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply
Done
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-269
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951627#3951627
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951627
___
JB
I have investigated quite a bit more. The defaults are still Lazy. My problem
was related to a toString method in my entity that recursively called all the
other entities attached to it (e.g. the many-to-many and one-to-many).
Somewhere this toString was called, resulting in my whole database
The default should certainly not have changed, since that is defined by the
spec ;-)
Ask in the EJB3 forum, I have not noticed any change in behavior, and I don't
think Emmanuel is monitoring this forum closely.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=
Easily fixed: just start a conversation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951613#3951613
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951613
___
JBoss-user m
EJB3 interceptors do not run on method calls to "this". Only on calls from
another object.
What I can do for you is promote the BusinessProcessInterceptor.createProcess()
method to a public API, so you can call it directly.
Add a feature request to JIRA.
View the original post :
http://www.jb
Sorry for answering myself!
Now I've found a way to solve my problem. It works when I use the
PortletSession and the APPLICATION_SCOPE. Now I have also found the way to get
the PortletSession from Seam:
((javax.portlet.PortletRequest)
getFacesContext().getExternalContext().getRequest()).getPor
Hi Gavin,
That worked. The business process context now picks up the correct process /
task.
(I got rid of the @BeginTask annotation on the method)
My app sets the task and then navigates to a new page to work on this task,
however the business process context seems to get reset by the next ev
Any ideas? Were there any compatibility changes from Beta-2 to now? I still
can't find any hints in the log
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951558#3951558
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=39
That's strange, because my @Create create() method is being called. The
stateless session bean in question is being used as a scheduled task (has an
@Timeout method), and I'm setting up the timer in the @Create method to fire
every second. And it's working... just that the @Logger is not being
I'll just do that then. Thanks a lot.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951524#3951524
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951524
___
JBoss-user mail
Well, this does _not_ occur in a clean install of Seam100GA/JBoss404GA/EJB3RC8
and the blog example.
So if you rollback to those versions, things will definitely work...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951523#3951523
Reply to the post :
http:
I get the exception whether I set myFacesLifecycleBug is set to true or false.
It is quite possible that I didn't properly upgrade to MyFaces 1.1.3 though.
I'll try to recreate a clean version of soon.
Unless a new release of Seam and JBoss get out before I do that :)
View the original post :
h
Ah! How could I miss it!!!
Thank you.! It's working, of course...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951521#3951521
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951521
___
Yah, but I try not to use JBoss-specific APIs
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951519#3951519
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951519
___
JBo
OK.
Another idea: if there was a hook for Seam to set those in JBoss per component,
Seam could keep those in-sync with whatever settings were in web.xml regarding
conversation timeout and session timeout.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=39515
MyFaces 1.1.3 does not have the bug, so set it to false.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951513#3951513
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951513
Well, since it is not a JSP, why would you expect jsp:include to work??
Use ui:include, just like in the examples.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951512#3951512
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
org.jboss.seam.core.init.myFacesLifecycleBug is set to true.
Also I'm using MyFaces 1.1.3
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951501#3951501
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951501
___
That was the problem!
I like to keep all jars in one directory; And the jboss-seam.jar was used both
under .ear and under web-inf/lib for this reason.
Selectively including the jars (instead of *) needed for the ear inside Ant
build.xml does the trick;
|
|
|
|
I don't see anything in the logs about afterCompletion. However, I modified my
EJB to be stateful with conversation scope, and now the database updates seem
to be working. Here is the modified code:
| @Stateful
| @Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION)
| @Name("accountEditor")
| public class A
So, as you can see quite clearly in the log, Seam scans your archive, finds the
classes, but does not decide that they are Seam components. Since the @Name
annotation exists on the classes, the only possibility is a classloading
problem QED.
ie. you have deployed two different copies of jboss-
Startup messages in zipped format can be found below;
http://www.bilgidata.com/downloads/server.zip
Thanks,
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951485#3951485
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
What does the Seam startup log look like?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951482#3951482
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951482
___
JBoss-user
(ie. this is a MyFaces 1.1.1/1.1.3 incompatibility issue.)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951481#3951481
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951481
__
I think you have the wrong setting for
org.jboss.seam.core.init.myFacesLifecycleBug
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951480#3951480
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951480
I have never used the Dell site, but yes, that is what you use ui:repeat or
h:dataTable for.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951479#3951479
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951479
___
ui:repeat might do the trick, I'm going to play with that this weekend to see
if I can get it to do what I need. Let me see if I can take another hack at an
explanation though...
I'm sure we've all been on the Dell site and configured a computer. That's
basically the UI I'm after. But, the m
It that true for Seam applications? I thought that Seam was a bit close to
JBoss Portal. I have read different places that JBoss Portal supports
interportel communication if they are build into the same portlet application.
Quote:
"Any object stored in the session using the APPLICATION_SCOPE is
anonymous wrote : How can I contribute to this effort?
No need, it is already fixed in CVS
anonymous wrote : From a design perspective, how do you see the relationship
between Seam and EJB on the long term? EJB3 was a *huge* improvement, but I
really see Seam's component model taking over on th
OK, now a slightly diff fix in CVS
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951471#3951471
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951471
___
JBoss-user mailing
Yes, this is a bug (my bug, not Norman's). The first line of the method should
read something more like:
order = em.find(orders.get(index).getOrderId());
I will fix that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951470#3951470
Reply to the post :
htt
701 - 800 of 4653 matches
Mail list logo