[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.3.0.SP2 TreeCacheListener not getting event

2006-06-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do use TreeCacheAop since TreeCacheAop just sub-classing from TreeCache now, I'd expect the behavior should be the same. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3951814#3951814 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.3.0.SP2 TreeCacheListener not getting event

2006-06-17 Thread var_4050
I saw the testcases u tested, I see that you used TreeCache , I am facing problems with TreeCacheAop as cache. If you could please check with TreeCacheAop, with which I am facing problems, of the listener not getting notified with optimistic locking enabled. I also checked it with latest

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.3.0.SP2 TreeCacheListener not getting event

2006-06-15 Thread var_4050
Dear Manik, We have stepped through the JBossCache code and these are our findings- 1. Optimistic locking does bring a layer of transaction workspace in between. However, the TransactionWorkspace takes care that the entries are added in the tree data structure starting from the root of the

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.3.0.SP2 TreeCacheListener not getting event

2006-06-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just added a unit test around this and this seems to receive notifications just fine. While this is in HEAD and not the 1.3.x branch, none of the notification or optimistic locking codebase has changed between 1.3.x and 1.4.x.

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.3.0.SP2 TreeCacheListener not getting event

2006-06-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One possibility is that notifications are only made when changes are made to the cache directly. Optimistic locking creates a layer - a 'workspace' - on which changes are applied to until transactions commit. Do you have any ongoing transactions (perhaps CMT) at the time, which may not be