[JBoss-user] [JBossWS] - Re: Clustering Webservices

2005-09-28 Thread pure
Thank you for the replys. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3897732#3897732 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3897732 --- This SF.Net email

[JBoss-user] [JBossWS] - Re: Clustering Webservices

2005-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason is right, a load balancer that supports sicky sessions will do. Tomcat handles the cookies. Ideally you would pass the buisiness session id in a SOAP header and have a handler deal with it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3897655#3897655

[JBoss-user] [JBossWS] - Re: Clustering Webservices

2005-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The goal to keep J2EE web services stateless is to bring simplicity and aid interoperability. Given this, I think you are doing the right approach of passing some form of session identifier to your business method in SLSB. It is now upto your business code to deal with stickiness. Maybe a com

[JBoss-user] [JBossWS] - Re: Clustering Webservices

2005-09-27 Thread pure
Is it possible to affect the HTTP header from a statless session bean that is exposed as a webservice? Where is it possible to do "header insertion"? Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3897370#3897370 Reply to the post : http://www.jb

[JBoss-user] [JBossWS] - Re: Clustering Webservices

2005-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It depends on where you are storing the state. If the state is shared you don't need stickiness. Otherwise, yes you could use a smart lb and sticky sessions. Most likely using header insertion. -Jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3897297#389