When i am using features =wsi I don't get any error but When I added
features=wsi,documentliteral I am getting following error
java.lang.Exception: The OperationDesc for insert was not synchronized to a
method of com.ca.ac.webservice.wrapper.Conta
ctWrapper.
at
Sorry for breaking the thread.
Since i am new user in development of JBOSSWS weebservice i am not sure where
do we specify the rpc/literal. I mean where do we mention the rpc n document
style?
I have used following files for creating webservice
ant task :
wscompile
| fork=
You specify that by giving the features more arguments in the wscompile ant
task. Write:
features=wsi,documentliteral
for document style and
features=wsi,rpcliteral for rpc.
Here is a good link for more info regarding wscompile (both as ant task and
separate program):
This seams to be an Axis error. Read about it here:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WSDOCServiceStepByStep
/Georg
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3871173#3871173
Reply to the post :
Try not to reuse a thread for different topics it makes it harder for people
searching the forums to find an answer.
That being said. your answer is that you have 2 options:
1. Pass the hostname in as the -b option to run.sh so that jboss binds only to
one interface
-or-
2. Edit the
I did read the wiki.
Among the few valid reasons to use RPC style web services is, that you have an
interoperability issue. For example you want to provide/consume a service
to/from .NET.
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WSMessageEndpoints
Maybe this line should not be there...?
Best
Sorry for the confusion, I updated the wiki. The reason Microsoft did not add
support for rpc/literal is because they have always been against rpc/literal
(for some very good reasons). The problem is that they were on the WS-I
profile 1.0 and 1.1 spec team, and that spec team decided to
anonymous wrote :
| Will this ever come in non-beta state?
|
Yes, its planned to roll out with the release of Visual Studio 2005. Visual
Studio 2005 Beta 2 is supposed to be released end of this month, and the final
version will be released in September.
-Jason
View the original post :
already in beta !? :)
from Microsoft download site:
File Name: dotnetfx.exe
Download Size: 24615 KB
Date Published: 7/27/2004
Version: 2.0
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=B7ADC595-717C-4EF7-817B-BDEFD6947019displaylang=en
Will this ever come in non-beta state?
We
You can read the wiki on why rpc/literal is a bad idea. Microsoft is right
dropping the ball on it.
You would have a better investment if you used doc/literal
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870440#3870440
Reply to the post :
Are you using rpc/literal on the java side? Microsoft has not implemented
rpc/literal (though it is planned in the .NET framework 2.0 release, already
available in 2.0 beta). If using a microsoft beta framework is not an option,
you may need to switch to document/literal.
-Jason
View the
Are there any SOAP messages beeing exchanged?
People were having issues with HTTP-1.1. Does this apply to you?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3869671#3869671
Reply to the post :
May be true but how come the Javaclient with Axis and other clients are able to
call the Webservice. Also I have generated the wsdl using the wscompile tool. I
have one doubt here it does not generates heirarchy for the all complex types.
What could be reason?
View the original post :
13 matches
Mail list logo
