Feel free to look at the release notes between 3.2.1 and 3.2.7. If you want a
definite answer read the code, or pay money to a JBoss consultant.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884814#3884814
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.htm
Hi Genmen,
You are saying jboss-3.2.1 is full of bugs. Full of bugs in what ? Full of
bugs in supporting JMS?
We are using jboss-3.2.1. Can I configure JbossMQ to point to other database
instead of Hypersonic?
Is upgrading jboss only the option to resolve my problem?
Thanks.
View the original
After the following code change it worked!.
QueueConnectionFactory qcf =
| (QueueConnectionFactory)
context.lookup("ConnectionFactory");
from
QueueConnectionFactory qcf =
| (QueueConnectionFactory)
context.lookup("java:/XA
After switching on the trace at the server where the queue is deployed,
I have the following information:
When the Standalone client is running:
Log file records few TRACE calls when the session is created and when the
message is sent
When the Servlet is running:
There is NO activity in the Log
Hello Rohan,
a follow-up to your follow-up...
"Rohan Talip" wrote :
| One thing I found necessary to do before reconnecting, was to close() and
stop() the old connection before getting a new connection, otherwise I
continued to see 'ping timeout' being logged from the old connection.
|
As
I have deployed the SampleQueue in Machine A and trying to look-up from a
servlet deployed on Machine B
I have made the following entry in jbossmq-destinations-service.xml
mbean code="org.jboss.mq.server.jmx.Queue"
name="jboss.mq.destination:service=Queue,name=SampleQueue"
/mbean
But, When i catch too many "close exception",then Jboss would send a
"Sockte:Open too many files" and stop work.
How can i fill it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884644#3884644
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modul
Don't persist the message? Refer to the spec on this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884633#3884633
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884633
-
It's DEBUG my friend, if it were an error you'd see ERROR in the logs.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884632#3884632
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884632
-
anonymous wrote : 1) Is is possible to manipulate messages in a queue/topic? We
want to be able to delete messages.
There are third-party tools, like HermesJMS, you can use.
If all you want to do is delete certain messages using a message selector, then
writing a trivial MBean to do so would be
Get a stack trace of your application and see what it's doing in JBoss land.
Also, upgrading and testing wouldn't hurt and might not be too hard to try...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884629#3884629
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.or
javax.jms.InvalidDestinationException: This destination does not exist!
QUEUE.SampleQueue
Where or how are you deploying the queue "SampleQueue"?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884626#3884626
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.h
3.2.1 is full of bugs, many critical, so upgrading to 3.2.7 at least is your
best bet.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884625#3884625
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884625
-
We have the same issue. I believe it's due to use of HSQLDB. Currently
investigating movign the backend data store for ConfigJBossMQDB to Oracle.
One thing I can't find an answer to is either this is available in 3.2.1. I am
afraid we will have to migrate to at least 3.2.4.
http://www.jboss.org
As I experiment with this more I find that it is a time delay in removing the
message from the queue.
If i sleep the consumer thread for a small random interval it helps break
things up. But I still get duplicates on each consumer.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mod
yes, it is a Queue. I am a little suprised at this problem, although I have
never done a Queue before usually always dealing with topics.
I need to distribute a process. a queue with multiple consumers seemed the
perfect answer, because each task passed along could get grabbed by exactly one
Hi,
No one replied so far to my question? Can any one have any idea please?
Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884540#3884540
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884540
--
I am using a default configuration of 4.0.2.
Also I tried the following options
1) I have removed the jvm-il-service.xml
2) Currently using uil2-service.xml
3) Modifed jbossmq-service.xml to remove the interceptor.
Still no luck.
Please help!!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org
After enabling the Trace for both java client and servlet following were the
output
Looks like the TracingInterceptor is one which is causing this problem.
Anybody faced the similar problem?
Java Client
[org.jboss.mq.SpySession] New session [EMAIL PROTECTED] ack=AUTO txid=null
RUNNING [EMAIL P
Are you sure that you are using a queue and not a topic?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884486#3884486
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884486
You might want to take a look at the TIBCO EJB Adapter. It runs within the
JBoss container and allows interactions with TIBCO RV messaging. TIBCO also has
an EJB plugin for their BW application.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884391#3884391
R
topic/queue: MessageConsumer.setMessageListener(null);
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884254#3884254
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884254
--
"nsayer" wrote : We have a client whose code looks somewhat like this:
|
| do {
| qc.start();
| runABunchOfThreadsThatProcess5000Messages();
| qc.stop();
| } while(shouldWeKeepGoing());
|
| (note that the method between start() and stop() waits for all the message
processin
You can do this with an JMX-MBean-method call of start/restartDelivery() of the
appropriate MDB invoker MBean. Use the JMX console to find your invoker MBean
named like
| jboss.j2ee : binding=message-driven-bean,jndiName=local/,plugin=invoker,service=EJB
|
Regards
Ulf
View the original p
Hi Kamal,
It works even if i specify
guest
Problem arises when i remove entire
tag itself.
-Jaikiran
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884150#3884150
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3
jaikiran,
Can you change the tag as below and check whether it works?
nobody
The value "guest" may not be identified by the UsersRolesLoginModule.
Kamal Chandana
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883981#3883981
Reply to the post :
The distribution of processing is one of the advantages you gain when the
client is not in the same machine.
When multiple clients are running in multiple machines, there will be a problem
for your response sender to decide the client that sent this particular
request. Since JMS is asynchronous
Yes, using MDB is the 'design' pattern for parallel (multi-threaded) data
processing within the J2EE environment. But keep in mind that message network
data distibution to multiple machines also cause some performance penalties.
So the general message is: do not distribute processing to multipl
I've read in a sun j2ee tutorial that distributed processing using multiple
machines may be achieved by having a sender (client) connect to multiple JMS
queues residing on remote machines. these remote machines can then host message
driven beans (or a client applications) that receive the messag
This is the intended usage model for JMS, so your design will work out of the
box. Nevertheless don't stress your idea of processing distribution to
multiple, multiple machines too much without prior propper testing of
achievable performance gains.
Regards
Ulf
View the original post :
http:/
Hi,
I have a class which writes to a JMS queue. There is a MDB which is listening
on this queue for a message. Once the message is received, the MDB does some
processing and returns back.
Problem is, if on some condition, on during processing the message, if the MDB
goes into a infinite loop,
Thanks Kamal, for the reply. While invoking the session bean from MDB, had you
done any special configuration settings in the xml files(like run-as in
ejb-jar.xml or changes to login-config.xml file)?
Even i was able to access the session beans from MDB(WITHOUT any changes to
login-config.xml o
For sure you can invoke a session bean from a MDB, I have experience in that.
Kamal
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883782#3883782
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883782
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfigJMSProvider
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883428#3883428
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883428
--
There is no MySQL specific mysql-jdbc-state-service.xml in the examples, this
is probably what led to the confusion...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883292#3883292
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod
hi,
I tried similar integration of JBoss 4.0.2 with Sonic MQ 5.0.2 using the
Service Provider jars from Professional Services group at Sonic. The Queues
defined in Sonic appear to tie well with queues declared in JBoss.
The issue I have is when I deploy MDBs that are listening on the queues I
Use 3.2.6+, there's documentation on setting up a JMS-only configuration.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883156#3883156
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883156
---
Hmm, 3.2.0 might have had a few problems. What about an upgrade to 3.2.7?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883155#3883155
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883155
--
Sorry about that. I meant to say the JMS_MESSAGES table and not the
JMS_TRANSACTIONS.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883140#3883140
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883140
-
thanks for the info ... will try it out ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883031#3883031
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883031
---
S
Ok I've found the answer, Jboss 4.0.2 MDB works with EJB 2.0 tags.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883004#3883004
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883004
-
Any plans to backport thsi fix to 3.2.x series? It should be trivial, no?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882997#3882997
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3882997
---
ok, problem solved.
just put the entries for the topic(factory) wrong.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882949#3882949
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3882949
--
Turn off debug, change log4j.xml
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882895#3882895
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3882895
---
SF.Net email
I´ve an idea about that.
It is possible to put a ThreadPriorityInterceptor into the interceptorchain of
the "Standard Message Driven Bean"?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882751#3882751
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m
Hello,
is there any solution about that?
I tried to set the thread priority to 2 in ejbCreate but
after a restartDelivery the priority of the thread is again 5.
Any solution.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882747#3882747
Reply to the post :
Comma seperated hosts/urls in the Context.PROVIDER_URL are supported.
| public class TestJNDI
| {
|public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
|{
| Properties env = new Properties();
| env.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
| "org.j
| | 2005-06-22 10:46:40,134 WARN [org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl]
[11195188290166/PTSI20050622+0] Lock contention, tx=TransactionImpl:XidImpl
[FormatId=257, GlobalId=seefdevbe02.ptsi.corppt.com//3, BranchQual=]
|
This seems to be a server side locking problem. Maybe within a receiving MDB
I think you can only have one URL in there at a time. You'll have to write the
logic yourself to fail over to the alternative URL if the first one fails.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882422#3882422
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/
yes...clustering JMS
i look the document of jboss...
i find jboss 4.x support clustering jms
but i don't know how to deploy it.
and have not book introduce this technique...
so.. :(
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882304#3882304
Please find the TRACE for both stopDelivery and startDelivery below.
I also ran the it using a debugger and put a breakpoint in the
JMSDestinationManager and found that in the startDelivery call the line
dc.getClientID() returned null.
I'll step through the whole process to find out why but fo
Bug report:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1925
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882133#3882133
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3882133
-
"apwalker" wrote : Looking at the source it is checking to see if the ClientId
is already connected. I'm not sure but shouldn't the stopDelivery remove the
clientID?
|
Yes it does. But since you don't show the logging for closing the connection
(including the TRACE logging as described in "RE
Sh*t, the most important part of the title just cut off.
So I need and MDB with XA transactions using a WSMQ.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3882107#3882107
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=
All the queue and topic information are exposed via JMX which can be browsed
using the web/jmx console.
If your after a GUI tool try http://www.hermesjms.com it's a bit buggy but does
the job.
regards,
Aaron
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=38
By default JBoss uses Hypersonic for JMS persistence, it is reccomended however
that this is replaced so you should still look at using your Oracle database
for the persistence of JMS messages.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881910#3881910
Re
Hi
I had a similar problem. After some googling, I had a clue. I forgot to change
the "Pad" attribute to true in $JBOSS_SERVER_HOME/conf/jboss-service.xml.
If tou don´t know what it is, just uncomment a line like that, in that file:
| true -- uncomment!!
|
Att
Murilo
View th
Take a look at the JMX console. I run the 3.2 release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881646#3881646
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881646
ok, I had to open port 8093 for UIL2 as well. Then everything worked fine
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881594#3881594
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881594
---
What version are you running? If it makes any difference I'm running 3.2.7
Is the message count in the logs, or in the web-console?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881550#3881550
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu
Hi,
I have made all non-serializable object "transient" in my EJBs. However, what
confuse me is, the EJBException is not caused by my class. It comes out of no
where, look at the warning messages. It says caused by
"org.jboss.mq.il.uil2.UILClientILService". Looking at the package name, I
assu
Make anything not serializable "transient" in your EJB.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881488#3881488
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881488
I think you might need to write an external program to re-write some of the
message data. It itself contains the destination name. I recommend you write
an MDB, on maybe another JBoss server, that runs once a night and does the
rewriting, then exits.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
You can turn on debug on the server and see what it's doing.
There's also a count of the # of scheduled messages and you can verify it is
the correct value after a restart.
I haven't had any problems with this feature like you describe...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.ht
How are you starting and stopping the transaction? It's either a
UserTransaction or Container one.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881485#3881485
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881485
If you had more a stack trace, I'd be able to tell you where the NPE is coming
from.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881484#3881484
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881484
--
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.jnetdirect.jsql.x
It appears JBoss can't serialize your message. Do you know if this class is in
your classpath?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881483#3881483
Reply to the post :
http://www.j
wow, what a great help. I hate this stupid answers...
I also have to create the connection between WebSphere MQ and JBoss and also
have problems by doing that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881371#3881371
Reply to the post :
http://www.
This should really be discussed in the EJB/JBoss forum as it relates to your
implementation of a Stateful session bean.
If you have a look at section 7.4.1 of the EJB 2.1 specification there is a
list of the items that can be referenced by the session bean when it is
passivated and serialized.
Oh I forgot to say, "Legacy App."
So if I were willing to add new code, I'd consume those messages in the MDB
then store them in another queue which nobody is consuming. But the queue
doesn't finish in time only when there are other problems, so I prefer a n
administration solution over a progr
This is a clear misuse of the JMS message subsystem. Rethink your overall
design !
Regards
Ulf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881241#3881241
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881241
--
Hi,
Thought to post the whole warning messages instead of part of it. It somehow
complains about the log4j logger by the end of the warning message:
CausedByException is: org.apache.log4j.Logger
Any idea? Do let me know if there's already a fix of it, please. I would like
much to learn of how
Hi
We're also having the same problem with JBoss 3.2.4 and j2sdk1.4.1
Can anyone help us?
Here is the warning message we've received:
org.jboss.mq.Connection - Connection failure:
org.jboss.mq.SpyJMSException: Connection Failed; - nested
throwable: (java.io.IOException: ping timeout.)
at org.jbo
similar threads
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848238#3848238
is my problem due to dead lock...is the solution can be applied to hypersonic
database?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881203#3881203
Reply to the post
After looking through the forums I have found my mistake:
QueueConnectionFactory jobsQCF =
(QueueConnectionFactory)ctx.lookup("java:/JmsXA")
fixed my problem.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881106#3881106
Reply to the post :
http://www.jb
I've replicated this using the all the default settings, changing the
TimeToLive to unlimited(0) and to 2+ hours in the future, with the same
results. I am using JBoss 3.2.7 if it makes any difference. I'll fill in a
bug-report and see what happens, and have a dig around the source.
It's not th
sorry guys, forget this...I've tried running client and server on different
network and nodes and it works therebut I still dont know why it does not
on my stuff:-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881076#3881076
Reply to the post :
http:/
As there is no standard for scheduled message delivery, there is no real
expected behaviour.
Nevertheless your observed behaviour (scheduled messages get dropped if server
restarts after schedule time) does not make sense to me unless you set
(explicitly or implicitly) a message expiration tim
As there is no standard for scheduled message delivery, there is no real
expected behaviour.
Nevertheless your observed behaviour (scheduled messages get dropped if server
restarts after schedule time) does not make sense to me unless you set
(explicitly or implicitly) a message expiration tim
Hi, could you confirm something for me please.
When I put a message on the queue with a 30 min delay, and restart the server
during that period, the messages still get delivered. I am using persistent
messages for all tests.
When I put another message on the queue with a 30 min delay, and rest
A queue is not an active comsumer, it's just a passiv data storage. Message
consumation is always initiated by a JMS client via receive call.
The fact that there are unconsumed messages in the file store that do not get
properly forwarded to your MDB (this is the active JMS receiver) might indic
I have the files correspoding to the JMS stored in the folder for the queue,
/jboss/server/default/data/jbossmq/file/QUEUE.queue
The messages that werent consumed before the server crash are still stored in
that folder... and after the restart, are "consumed" because the queue
configuration file
I think the referenced wiki page is a sufficient starting point.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880953#3880953
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3880953
Thanks for the response.
Is there a list of issues for the File PM. The problems listed above are
quite vague.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880946#3880946
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl
You can submit a patched file pm with the reliability enhancements discussed in
this thread that performs better than the existing hsqldb solution with tuning
so that we can evaluate support for it. We are currently pursuing investigation
of hsqldb tuning as I suggested earlier.
View the origi
Is there a resolution to this issue?
Answer 1. Its Slow now and always will be.
Answer 2. v4.0.x will support a fast message persistence method (for large
messages) in release 4.0.xx (may be using the file system to peristence
messages)?
Answer 3. Here are the some tuning parameters to JDBC w
Instead of:-
TextMessage message = session.createTextMessage();
|
| for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
| message.setText("This is message " + (i + 1));
| System.out.println("Sending message: " +
| message.getTex
I've had problems using the JDBC persistence methods with 3.2.x and used the
File Persistence method, its reliable and quite fast (unless you puts 1,000's
of messages in the queue, which you can use MaxDepth to restrict the queue
size).
The most reliable solution we use is 3.2.3 RMIConnectionFa
Hi Scott,
Thank you very much for your response. Finally it turned out that that was my
mistake. Yes, you are right, old version of Primitives was used in my programm.
the package was not added to CLASSPATH but defined in manifest of other jar
file. So it was tricky to find.
Thanks for your
A queue does not 'comsume' any messages by itself. Maybe you do not use
persistent messages, so these in-memory-only messages get lost in case of a
server crash.
Regards
Ulf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880918#3880918
Reply to the post
Hi all, i have seen this post and i have a question...
As you have a MDB associated to the queue... what happens if the server crash
and there are still messages in the queue for processing?
i have a similar achitecture in my application and i have that problem... the
messages are consumed becaus
Thank you a lot!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880888#3880888
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3880888
---
This SF.Net email is sponsor
How much memory should a soft reference use?
Using the default cache settings, my memory usage (based on the Windows Task
Manager) was about 200MB more when there was 100,000 messages waiting to be
consumed than when the queue was empty. The total java memory was at 300MB.
So, assuming that
no overhead. Just keep in mind that this is a JBoss specifc feature which might
hinder a possible port to another app server (but hy should you :-)
Regards
Ulf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880846#3880846
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbos
Thanks, that's great. It seems to do exactly what we need. Are there any
overheads we should be aware of to this method?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880843#3880843
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
The following unit test works fine for me. You need to track down the source of
the invalid org.jboss.util.Primitives class in your classpath.
|public void testMapMessage() throws Exception
|{
| log.info("+++ testMapMessage");
| MapMessage sent = session.createMapMess
thanks for all the help.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880809#3880809
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3880809
---
This SF.Net email is
Typical Failure Scenario
A typical failure scenario is JBoss crashing, or getting outofmemory, in this
scenario File PM recovers fine (in 3.2.3).
3.2.7
I recently looked at using 3.2.7 because of some fixes to JMS since 3.2.3 (UIL2
leak and some other bits), but 3.2.7 seemed unable to recover
The Boss specific scheduled message delivery feature might do the job:
| aConnection = QueueFactory.createQueueConnection(sQueueUser,
sQueuePassword);
| aSession=
aConnection.createQueueSession(false,QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
| aSender = aSession.createSender(rQueue);
| Te
If there is no in-built way has anyone managed to come up with an elegant
solution. Everything we can come up with involves re-queuing and sleeping,
which leaves something to be desired
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880730#3880730
Reply to t
1201 - 1300 of 4095 matches
Mail list logo
