Just set the category "org.jboss" to INFO, there is an example in conf/log4j.xml
You'll notice it is much faster as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842331#3842331
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
Sorry if I shooÂd a hamster out of the hen house but it would be nice if Jboss
didnÂt print stack trace's to the log file unless there is actually a problem. I
would much rather have the code changed to:
public void asynchFailure(String error, Throwable e)
{
if (trace)
log
This is a debug message saying the connection has been closed.
I don't see the relevence.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842229#3842229
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842229
---
For whatever it is worth I have tracked down with exception to the following code (I
think).
org.jboss.mq.il.uil2.SocketManager.java
private void handleStop(String error, Throwable e)
{
.
.
.
replyAll(e);
if (handler != null)
{
The exception I get on the server log is the following.
2004-07-06 10:27:59,743 DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.il.uil2.SocketManager] End WriteTask.run
2004-07-06 10:27:59,743 DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.il.uil2.ServerSocketManagerHandler]
Exiting on IOE
java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
at java.net.
As a DEBUG/TRACE message correct?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840541#3840541
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3840541
---
This SF.Net
The problem went away when I recompiled the server and client of my application with
the 3.2.4 jar's. But I still get a SocketException on the server when I execute
queueConnection.close() on the client.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840507
Ignored because of lack of information/example.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840217#3840217
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3840217
-
After tracing through the code it looks like the subscriber is not being removed from
the queue before the system tries to delete the queue.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839981#3839981
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m
