[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Deferred use of JMSReplyTo / Destination.toString()

2005-03-21 Thread lekkim
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : If you cannot maintain the javax.jms.Destination object | you can do session.createQueue(...) from Queue.getQueueName() | provided you are talking to the same jms server. | Yeah I figured as much since the interface doesn't extend java.io.Serializable... The que

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Deferred use of JMSReplyTo / Destination.toString()

2005-03-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you cannot maintain the javax.jms.Destination object you can do session.createQueue(...) from Queue.getQueueName() provided you are talking to the same jms server. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3871041#3871041 Reply to the post : http://ww

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: Deferred use of JMSReplyTo / Destination.toString()

2005-03-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JMS specification does not say anything about naming policy. So the 'queue' prefix is specific to JBoss. Chances of JBoss future relase changing this is very dim, unless JMS Specification changes drastically :) Amit. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtop