[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: QueueSession commits not automatically synchronized with

2006-01-20 Thread svinther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : | * Not using pooled transactional jms resource adapter Is this not fixed this by using java:/JmsXA as connection factory, as configured in my earlier post ? anonymous wrote : | * Not using said pooled resource as a pool instead allocating resources per ejb

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: QueueSession commits not automatically synchronized with

2006-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svinther wrote : or am I doing something else wrong. | Yes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3918398#3918398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3918398

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: QueueSession commits not automatically synchronized with

2006-01-19 Thread svinther
Well I found out that I needed to lookup java:/JmsXA as the ConnectionFactory. I thought I already did that before and got a ClassCast Exception, but I guess I did something else wrong at that time. So could you please be a little more specifc about what else im doing wrong. Also I have read

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: QueueSession commits not automatically synchronized with

2006-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
svinther wrote : | So could you please be a little more specifc about what else im doing wrong. | I could but you could also use search and even enable trace logging so we have a clue what you are talking about. Your mistakes in the original post. * Not using pooled transactional jms

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: QueueSession commits not automatically synchronized with

2006-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossHelp Will help you get better (any) answers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3918419#3918419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3918419