[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: oracle can not persist BLOB in JMS_MESSAGES table

2005-03-18 Thread MGruener
I had a similar problem to this and it was fixed by upgrading ojdbc14.jar to version 10.1.0.3.0. I did not have to switch to oci. Thin now works for me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870802#3870802 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: oracle can not persist BLOB in JMS_MESSAGES table

2004-12-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should switch to OCI, this is the only way as far as I know. The other option, recommend by the Hibernate community is to drop Oracle drivers altogether and use those from DataDirect http://www.datadirect.com/products/jdbc/matrix/jdbcpublic.htm or InetSoftware http://www.inetsoftware.de/E

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: oracle can not persist BLOB in JMS_MESSAGES table

2004-12-06 Thread m0nstermind
This is because Oracle JDBC driver is not JDBC conformant. Or they want to teach us all how to live. They believe, that using statement.setInputStream(), like jdbc2.PersistenceManager does, is not efficient enough to use, so they limited it to 4kb (actually this is because they passing BLOB as a

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: oracle can not persist BLOB in JMS_MESSAGES table

2004-12-03 Thread ckmod
I am experiencing the same problem with oracle 8.0.6 and jdbc driver version 9.0.1.4: I cannot store blobs larger than 4KB...:-( View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3857341#3857341 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=po

[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: oracle can not persist BLOB in JMS_MESSAGES table

2004-11-12 Thread genman
Oracle seems to think that 4k is enough for you pure 100% Java people. You can either use MySQL or Postgres, or pay $$$ for a third-party driver. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855068#3855068 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.h