[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-04-24 Thread Sacha Labourey
So, what is the feedback on that yohanfer? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832230#3832230 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832230 --- Th

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-26 Thread Sacha Labourey
ok, let us know, it becomes better. But we are still way behind. Do you have a way to measure individual times i.e. time of the servlet layer, EJB layer, DB access, etc. and check which layers costs time? 3.2.4 should be released in 10 days. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopi

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-26 Thread yohanfer
Hello people, Just to give you some info on my progress, I've done a lot of changes that you have suggested like making Tomcat run in production mode, making sessions replicate ASYNC etc The new version of the clustering doc (edition 7) is excellent in the aspect that it covers a lot of th

Re: [JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-25 Thread Vladyslav Kosulin
yohanfer wrote: About the threads, I agree about thread sizes in principle, but weblogic handles the same traffic with 15 threads! Do you use Weblogic with Sun jvm or with JRockit? Vlad --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-24 Thread remm
About web tier performance: the default configuration isn't very optimal with JBoss 3.2.3. This is improved in 3.2.4 RC 1 (along with the significantly faster Tomcat 5), but by default, JBoss is more in "development" configuration than "production". Some basic steps: - Disable logging for the we

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-24 Thread yohanfer
Hi Sacha, Well, the ideal situation for clustering is the instant replication mode for the minimal data loss. The values for that vs non-clustered is actually 1.19 vs 0.579 sec/page. The previous values were for a 2 second interval replication vs non-clustered. About the threads, I agree about

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-24 Thread slaboure
Hello Yohan, At least, it seems to indicate that clustering has no bad effect (removing from web.xml deactivates it), this is good. Concerning the thread pool, DO increment it to 100 or 200 (as you have 100 concurrent users, you should have at least 100 threads to serve them) and make sure thi

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-24 Thread yohanfer
Hi Sacha, Thanks for your quick reply. The only clustering I have enabled ( as far as I know) is the HttpSession replication. I turned this off by removing the setting in the web.xml for the non-clustered test. I haven't set any EJBs to be clusterable. The results of the non-clustered was 0.

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-24 Thread slaboure
Also: - were you using synchronous or asynchronous replication of http sessions? - what kind of replication trigger do you use in jboss-web.xml (GET, GET_AND_SET, etc.) Have you disabled transaction-service.xml debug mode? Have you removed Tomcat JSP hot-recompilation (to detect JSP page chang

[JBoss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 Vs Weblogic 8.1 SP2

2004-03-24 Thread slaboure
What performance do you get by disabling clustering completely? Just for comparison. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827263#3827263";>View the original post http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3827263>Reply to the post --