[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Better performance?

2004-11-30 Thread smileyq
After working with the optimization of my entity beans I have taken the page load down from 5 seconds to 1 or less by switching to using CMR methods of my entity beans instead of using the finder methods of the target side of the relationship. I setup read ahead with on-find and noticed a huge

[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Better performance?

2004-11-26 Thread schmidts
IMHO using CMR accessors for retrieving the objects on the many-side of a relationship instead of using a finder could yield better performance in certain scenarios. Here's why: the persistence manager always has to sync all in-memory changes of persistent objects to the database right before

[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Better performance?

2004-11-26 Thread smileyq
I really appreciate all of the responses I have received so far. I am still working on fine tuning perfomance of this application using the jboss loading methods. One problem that I see if that my tables are way too normalized and this cases performance problems while using entity beans. I am

[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Better performance?

2004-11-25 Thread jobor
I have thought about the same thing. Why should I not use a normal finder for getting the childs. But most likely your FK field is not available as a CMP field which can be used in EJB-QL. If you need the bean and the childs in 1 transaction you can consider the use of left-join read-ahead.

[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Better performance?

2004-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can also map foreign key fields to the columns CMP fields are mapped to. So you could add a CMP column that represents a foreign key and use it in queries. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3856473#3856473 Reply to the post :