[JBoss-user] [Security JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Security for remote but not for local EJB?

2005-03-22 Thread SeverityOne
Well, I've just reverted to the old way of working, where web applications have to login as well. Almost a week of searching on the web and in forums has only yielded scattered information that didn't prove to work. Thanks, for everyone who may have given this issue some thought. But the lack

[JBoss-user] [Security JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Security for remote but not for local EJB?

2005-03-21 Thread SeverityOne
After searching some more, I stumbled upon the reference to 'unauthenticatedPrincipal'. I installed a new version of XDoclet and had this line added to jboss.xml. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? | !DOCTYPE jboss PUBLIC -//JBoss//DTD JBOSS 3.0//EN http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_3_0.dtd;

[JBoss-user] [Security JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Security for remote but not for local EJB?

2005-03-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read the unauthenticatedIdentity option on the jboss login modules. This combined with unchecked method permissions on the local interfaces will allow for unrestricted local access and secured remote access. View the original post :

[JBoss-user] [Security JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Security for remote but not for local EJB?

2005-03-21 Thread SeverityOne
Hi Scott, Thanks for your reply. However, I'm missing some essential bit of information to understand the problem. I've read about unauthenticatedIdentity and unauthenticatedPrincipal, but tweaking with these has not led to solving the issue: I keep getting the checkSecurityAssociation ...

[JBoss-user] [Security JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Security for remote but not for local EJB?

2005-03-21 Thread SeverityOne
OK, that piece of XML is totally incorrect, but this application-policy name=appnetauth |authentication | login-module code=mt.com.vodafone.appnet.jaas.JBossAppnetLoginModule | flag=required | module-option