er] Better performance with Sun 1.4 or IBM JVM?
winmail.dat
Description: application/ms-tnef
pthreads)
>
> Maybe I'm doing something wrong in here.
>
> Alin
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Knight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Better performance
t;
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Better performance with Sun 1.4 or IBM JVM?
>
>
&g
Windows 2000 and Jboss 3.0
- Original Message -
From: "Alin Simionoiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:04 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Better performance with Sun 1.4 or IBM JVM?
On what platforms did you try JRockit?.
2002 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Better performance with Sun 1.4 or IBM JVM?
I have been trying 1.4 and have hit a few snags so far.
I also tried JRockit 1.3 and it worked very well...but I don't think it is
free. At least, not anymore.
Everything I have read
Hi,
> That is what I thought too, after reading the post about it on
> TheServerSide.com.
> But both the license and this press release on their website
> clearly state
> it is for evaluation (30 days) only:
> http://www.jrockit.com/about/releases/2002-01-17.html
>
> Is there somewhere in writi
.
> Before that, it was evaluation and for fee use.
>
> >
> > I guess I will try IBM and see how that goes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROT
free???
Thanks,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Better performance with Sun 1.4 or IBM JVM?
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 18:16, Steve Knig
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:40:56PM +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> bug :
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=562972&group_id=22866&atid=376685
Many thanks.
Cheers,
Simon
--
"At Lonix everyone is too busy drinking to talk about Linux. A newbie
might get the impression we were dri
bug :
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=562972&group_id=22866&atid=376685
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 18:26, Simon Stewart wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:55:45PM +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 17:35, Steve Knight wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > Just wondering what t
l try IBM and see how that goes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Better pe
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:55:45PM +0200, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 17:35, Steve Knight wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Just wondering what the recommended JVM for JBoss 3.0 is?
> > Does one clearly perform better than the other? And what about stability?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 18:08, David Ward wrote:
> Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 17:35, Steve Knight wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>Just wondering what the recommended JVM for JBoss 3.0 is?
> >>Does one clearly perform better than the other? And what about stability?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
know.
I guess I will try IBM and see how that goes.
Thanks,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Kotsbak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Better performance with Sun 1.4 or IBM JVM?
Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 17:35, Steve Knight wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>Just wondering what the recommended JVM for JBoss 3.0 is?
>>Does one clearly perform better than the other? And what about stability?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Steve
>
>
> Until a classcast-problem is solved with 1.4
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 17:35, Steve Knight wrote:
> Hello,
> Just wondering what the recommended JVM for JBoss 3.0 is?
> Does one clearly perform better than the other? And what about stability?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
Until a classcast-problem is solved with 1.4, I would recommend sticking
with
Hello,
Just wondering what the recommended JVM for JBoss
3.0 is?
Does one clearly perform better than the
other? And what about stability?
Thanks,
Steve
17 matches
Mail list logo
