gt;
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
> |Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:11 AM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss Best platform/Java implementation
> |
> |
> |Achilleus Mantz
interesting
this is really worth a write up in the documentation.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
|Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:11 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss Best platform/Java
Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
> I read somewhere in the docs that win 2000 may outperform linux kernel 2.2
> even by 2 times when not using apache/jetty for thread mngmnt, because
> of the lack of "real" linux threads.
> As far as i know this is not the case in kernel 2.4 which supports
> kernel-spac
I made a pretty similar comment on either dev or user
a couple of weeks ago, which promtped a useful
response.
You should be able to find it in the archive.
http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07882.html
The outcome was that the doc was, (IMHO) dangerously,
out of da
I read somewhere in the docs that win 2000 may outperform linux kernel 2.2
even by 2 times when not using apache/jetty for thread mngmnt, because
of the lack of "real" linux threads.
As far as i know this is not the case in kernel 2.4 which supports
kernel-space threads.
Any experience / thoughts
