: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
If you are using linux on both boxes connected directly with
crossover-cable you might actually use special kernel functionality for
that specific setup. Have not used it myself, but it is there i
Hiram?
-Original Message-
From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:Sacha.Labourey@;ml.cogito-info.ch]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
I don't exactly know what is happening under the cover in this case. What I
am s
my message about hanging on to the connection which can lead to
> >22,000 messages per second?
>
> .peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:Sacha.Labourey@;ml.cogito-info.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
on to the connection which can lead to
>22,000 messages per second?
.peter
-Original Message-
From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:Sacha.Labourey@;ml.cogito-info.ch]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
And if your issue
24 octobre 2002 17:00
> À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Objet : RE: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
>
>
> Is there a way to reduce latency between 2 boxes connected with a 4 foot
> crossover cable? Seams to me that this should provide the highest
> throughput
> possible.
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
I don't exactly know what is happening under the cover in this case. What I
am saying is that if you have a single connection that does this:
1) take a message
2) send it
3) when s
t; De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:jboss-user-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]De la part de Peter
> Luttrell
> Envoye : mardi, 22 octobre 2002 07:41
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
>
>
> In order to ascertain if JBossMQ is capable of p
onnections? If not, why not?
.peter
-Original Message-
From: Rupp,Heiko [mailto:heiko.rupp@;bancotec.de]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
> You should however have some difficulty filling up gigabit
]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 7:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
Will this change mean that any programs will still continue to use
"ConnectionFactory" in the JNDI lookup, but will get new OIL2 factory?
>From which version is
1000-1050 messages per second
> OIL2: 550-600 messages per second
>
> .peter
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Corby Page [mailto:CorbyPage@;duke-energy.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-us
;duke-energy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBossMQ Perforamance
Peter,
The new OIL2 Invocation layer is supposed to contain significant
performance enhancements. Plug in org.jboss.mq.il.oil2.OIL2ServerILService
as your new Invocation
Peter,
The new OIL2 Invocation layer is supposed to contain significant
performance enhancements. Plug in org.jboss.mq.il.oil2.OIL2ServerILService
as your new Invocation Layer and let us know the new results.
Thanks,
Corby
---
This sf.net e
> You should however have some difficulty filling up gigabit
> ethernet from
Packets per second is one thing. The other is packet size.
With small packets, a network adapter or switch can be at its
limit even if the network if not filled.
On the other hand with large packets a network can fill up
I must have been smoking. Seeing that the time slice per message will
be shorter for Gigabit ethernet, the collision theory is mostly
incorrect unless you have lots of users on same segment.
You should however have some difficulty filling up gigabit ethernet from
one pc.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at
Have you tried multiple client connections? I'm also thinking that maybe
the probability of collisions on Gigabit ethernet is the same as on
100Mbit as it is not governed by capacity but time. It could actually
mean that it is not possible to send that much more packets on Gigabit
than on 100Mbit.
In order to ascertain if JBossMQ is capable of providing the throughput
I need, i've constructed a couple of little apps to see what kind of
performance i can get. Here's what i've found:
100 Megabit: 1250-1350 messages per second
Gigabit: 1500-1600 messages per second
I was hoping to see a b
16 matches
Mail list logo
