RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-11-22 Thread Bill Burke
One more thing, I benched with JBoss 3.0.4 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Burke > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 > > >

RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-11-22 Thread Bill Burke
, 2002 4:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 > > > I forgot to point out the thread pool settings earlier, thanks > for bring that > up: > > Jetty/Tomcat maxProcessors: 2, acceptCount: 20 > > Oracle Connection Pool Max: 1200 (never

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-11-22 Thread Chris Bonham
ect > JBoss Group, LLC > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Bonham > > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:17 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [JB

RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-11-22 Thread Bill Burke
240 concurrent users. Bill Burke Chief Architect JBoss Group, LLC > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Bonham > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-11-22 Thread Marius Kotsbak
t; > > > > Bill Burke wrote: > > > > > Actually, I've been doing some performance tests lately(ECPERF) and Linux > > > sucks, really sucks. (Haven't tried the IBM threading model though). Win2k > > > is much better performing, al

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-11-22 Thread Chris Bonham
tried the IBM threading model though). Win2k > > is much better performing, although I hate to admit it. > > > > Bill > > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >>[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-07 Thread Marius Kotsbak
Alwyn Schoeman wrote: >Have anyone tried the 2.5 series kernels? I hear that there is some >major threading changes there... > Isnt't 2.5 dangerous to use in production? If it is to be tested, I think you have to use it on a PC where you have nothing valuable. > >On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:43:3

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-06 Thread Guy Rouillier
MAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:16 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 > Just set JAVA_HOME to where you installed the Java SDK. i.e. if the > java.exe you want to use is c:\jdk1.3.1\bin\java.exe then set JAVA_HOME > to c:\jd

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-06 Thread Alwyn Schoeman
Have anyone tried the 2.5 series kernels? I hear that there is some major threading changes there... On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:43:32AM -0500, Stephen Davidson wrote: > Greetings. > > I have been getting more than adequate performance on some boxes running Linux >2.4.10 & 2.4.18. The 2.4.18 do

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-06 Thread Matt Goodall
CTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:28 AM > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 > > > > > I am using Jboss3.0 with Tomcat 4.0.3 with Win98. I plan to use with > > > Win2000. ANyone has faced any issues that I need to

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-05 Thread Guy Rouillier
"Rupp,Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:28 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 > > I am using Jboss3.0 with Tomcat 4.0.3 with Win98. I plan to use with > > Win2000. ANyone has faced any issues that I need

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-04 Thread Stephen Davidson
though). Win2k > is much better performing, although I hate to admit it. > > Bill > > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:32 AM >

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-04 Thread Marius Kotsbak
Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:32 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 >> >> >>Why not upgradin

RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-04 Thread Rupp,Heiko
> I am using Jboss3.0 with Tomcat 4.0.3 with Win98. I plan to use with > Win2000. ANyone has faced any issues that I need to take care of when > deploying ? I DON'T want to use it as service for Win2000. JBoss 3.2beta runs just fine here on W2k SP2. You might need to hardcode the path to the JDK

RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-04 Thread Georg Schmid
it's 4x less than on Solaris for a large, Swing-based app). Regards Georg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 23:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 Actu

RE: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-03 Thread Bill Burke
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000 > > > Why not upgrading to a better OS like linux or *BSD? > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:56:29PM +0530, Ar

Re: [JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-03 Thread marius
Why not upgrading to a better OS like linux or *BSD? On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:56:29PM +0530, Arijit Ghosh wrote: > I am using Jboss3.0 with Tomcat 4.0.3 with Win98. I plan to use with > Win2000. ANyone has faced any issues that I need to take care of when > deploying ? I DON'T want to use it as

[JBoss-user] Jboss on WIN2000

2002-10-03 Thread Arijit Ghosh
I am using Jboss3.0 with Tomcat 4.0.3 with Win98. I plan to use with Win2000. ANyone has faced any issues that I need to take care of when deploying ? I DON'T want to use it as service for Win2000. Regards, Arijit --- This sf.net email is