Yes I mean this, but Z is not an entity bean just an entry in the table.
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jordi Valldaura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-user] RC2 p
.
JV> jordi
JV> - Original Message -
JV> From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JV> To: "Jordi Valldaura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JV> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:09 PM
JV> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] RC2 possible bug in m:n relationships
?. Sorry for my
english its hard to explain.
jordi
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jordi Valldaura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] RC2 possible bug in m:n relationshi
It should work. Could you provide a test case?
alex
Tuesday, March 04, 2003, 2:12:30 PM, Jordi Valldaura wrote:
JV> Hello,
JV> I've been working with 3.0.6 and yesterday I decided to change to 3.2rc2.
JV> But
JV> one of my bean relationship stopped working, I have another m:n relationship
JV> a
Hello,
I've been working with 3.0.6 and yesterday I decided to change to 3.2rc2.
But
one of my bean relationship stopped working, I have another m:n relationship
and it works, the only diference is that in the first one of the fields is a
string(varchar in sql) and the other is an Integer(int(11).
