HEAD as of yesterday should be slower as I turned on object copying in
getters and setters. When a getter is called we return a copy of the
internal value and when you set a value it makes a copy of the passed
in value. If you are not using immutable types this can slow you down.
Right now I
Today I executed my little performance test with current cvs-versions of
3.2 and HEAD.
The execution time for this testcase dropped to ~ 60 min with HEAD: a
significant improvement.
But the execution time with 3.2RC5 is even better: ~ 50 min.
So I will take your suggestion and use 3.2 for now.
chance of that change being backported to 3.2?
From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 23:06:41 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] massive performance decrease
Ok now it should be faster then is has ever been. I have anothe
Any chance of that change being backported to 3.2?
> From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 23:06:41 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] massive performance decrease
>
> Ok now it should be f
Ok now it should be faster then is has ever been. I have another idea
on how to make it even better, but it should be super fast right now.
-dain
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
JBoss HEAD is a work in progress. The performance will get worse and
better; there
JBoss HEAD is a work in progress. The performance will get worse and
better; there will be bugs. You can't make an omelet without breaking
a few eggs. I suggest you use 3.2.
-dain
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Langelage, Frank wrote:
After the cvs update of JBoss-head yesterday,
After the cvs update of JBoss-head yesterday, I encountered a massive
performance decrease for one of my testcases.
The update included the changes from Dain of the last days.
Three EJB's are involved by this task:
1. Item, CMP EntityBean
PK itemId
2. BoM, CMP EntityBean,
PK primItemId+posN
