On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Marko Asplund wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
>
> > local interfaces are not allowed to be accessed remotely. Therefore
> > they are called local :)
>
> ok, but with respect to what is locality defined?
yes, locality is defined in terms of the same JVM.
MA> ok, but with respect to what is locality defined? is the use of local
MA> interfaces only allowed for EJBs and other components (Servlets, JSPs)
MA> running inside the same JBoss/JVM instance?
exactly!
--
Best regards,
Alex Loubyansky
---
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
> local interfaces are not allowed to be accessed remotely. Therefore
> they are called local :)
ok, but with respect to what is locality defined? is the use of local
interfaces only allowed for EJBs and other components (Servlets, JSPs)
running inside
Hello Marko,
local interfaces are not allowed to be accessed remotely. Therefore
they are called local :)
alex
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 5:23:54 PM, you wrote:
MA> hi
MA> i'm trying to use the local interface for a EJB session bean which i'm
MA> developing (with JBoss 3.
hi
i'm trying to use the local interface for a EJB session bean which i'm
developing (with JBoss 3.0). the EJB client can successfully use the
remote bean and home interfaces but when i change the client to use local
interfaces i get the following error message from the cl
