Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nathan Hoover
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2003 20:40
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [JBoss-user] JBoss.NET error
This worked for me (of course) and my problem with the JNDI name went
away.
Hopefully this jar will b
Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nathan Hoover
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2003 20:40
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [JBoss-user] JBoss.NET error
This worked for me (of course) and my problem with the JNDI name went
away.
Hopefully this jar will be in
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [JBoss-user] JBoss.NET error
This worked for me (of course) and my problem with the JNDI name went
away.
Hopefully this jar will be included as part of the 3.2
release.
I am now having a new problem:
An unhandled exception of type
'System.Web.Service
it as a part of the jboss.net
build cd
jboss.netbuild it is
then generated into output/lib/ CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nathan Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2003 16:04
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re:
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2003 16:04
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-user] JBoss.NET error
I have 3.2RC4, which was released on Sunday. Shouldn't I have the
right code?
How can I get just the XDoclet module without rebuilding JBoss in its
entirety?
N
At 03:33 PM 3/25/
Title: Nachricht
I
guess that the xdoclet module is not automatically part of the distro
So you
need to build it as a part of the jboss.net build
cd
jboss.net
build
it
is then generated into output/lib/
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Nathan Hoover
[mailto:
I have 3.2RC4, which was released on Sunday. Shouldn't I have the right
code?
How can I get just the XDoclet module without rebuilding JBoss in its
entirety?
N
At 03:33 PM 3/25/2003 +0100, you wrote:
this
bug has been resolved in the 3.2 branch last week. If you get the latest
sources, it shoul
Title: Nachricht
this
bug has been resolved in the 3.2 branch last week. If you get the latest
sources, it should not occur anymore.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Nathan Hoover
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. März 2003
14:33An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re
Dr. Jung,
Adding names to the elements got rid of the undeployment stack
traces, though now I've chosen not use them (now that I know I don't
need them).
Thanks again for your help,
David
--
Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
> David,
>
> Of course I am always giving bad examples ;-) They should
David,
Of course I am always giving bad examples ;-) They should be named but
doesn´t matter how.
The handlers are there in the store web services in order to enlarge the
transaction
borders around the session beans when you need to serialize/deserialize
entity beans
(getting/setting values must
10 matches
Mail list logo