RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement

2002-09-20 Thread Venkateshwar Bommineni
tem.out.println("no message found"); break; } } if(vec.size()>0){ for(int p=0;pmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement Maybe you get an answer if you are m

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement

2002-09-20 Thread Georg Schmid
Maybe you get an answer if you are more specific. Read http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Regards Georg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Venkateshwar Bommineni Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 21:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement

2002-09-06 Thread Venkateshwar Bommineni
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement Venkateshwar, I looked in 'Java Message Service' from O'Reilly and it seems that messages will be removed fr

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement

2002-09-06 Thread MHewitt
t that is the theory...) Good luck, - Mike -Original Message- From: Venkateshwar Bommineni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement Mike, I am not using any explicit persistent messagin

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement

2002-09-06 Thread Venkateshwar Bommineni
difference btw AUTO and CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGE features. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement Are you using persistent messaging? If you are

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS client acknowledgement

2002-09-06 Thread MHewitt
Are you using persistent messaging? If you are not, messages which have no current receivers are discarded. Your example code shows this. Try placing the sender and receiver code in different threads and run them concurrently. I would also set your receiver timeout a bit longer or your receive lo