RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-07-01 Thread Bill Burke
, July 01, 2003 8:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again > > > As an addition to this, I should point out that you do see the memory > reclaimed eventually. About three to four hours in idle time on my test > system, sees the R

RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-07-01 Thread Jon Barnett
, you might appreciate the immediate memory reclaim and the reduced GC interruption later. JonB > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Barnett > Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Jon Barnett
draw your own conclusions. JonB > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela Ban > Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 4:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again > > > Jon, > &g

RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Bill Burke
Object creation kills you. In any language > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela Ban > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again >

RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Bill Burke
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Barnett > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again > > > Good question. I'm not saying that standard JBoss should include

Re: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Bela Ban
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela Ban Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 2:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again Hi Jon, I haven't played with Trove yet, so bear with me. My question is, is it wise

RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Jon Barnett
the code? Is it a problem with the JVM? Brighter minds must think on this. I'm only making observations. ;) JonB > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela Ban > Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 2:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Bill Burke
done a bit of this over the past 8 months. You guys are doing some cool stuff. Keep it up. Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela Ban > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: [JBoss-user] On the performance trail - again

2003-06-30 Thread Bela Ban
Hi Jon, I haven't played with Trove yet, so bear with me. My question is, is it wise to use the Trove collection classes when you have them in the JDK already ? Also, in Tiger (JDK 1.5) we will have collection classes that are further optimized and suited for high-performance reentrant use (ja