RE: [JBoss-user] Re: clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB

[Sacha Labourey]

then simply use sticky sessions on your load-balancer, and do not replicated anything on jboss side. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ECY Sent: vendredi, 28. novembre 2003 03:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB For web client. Subject:           RE: [JBoss-user] clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB      Date:           Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:37:32 +0100      From:           "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Reply-To:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     web client or fat java client?           From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ECY         Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2003 04:40         To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]         Subject: [JBoss-user] clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB           Sorry for this stupid question, but if I NEED load distribution and DOESN'T NEED fail-over feature (fault tolerance),         do I have to cluster the jboss instances when using SLSB?   Or will load-balancer + sticky session be more         appropriate for this scenario?                  Thanks in advance!                  Regards,         Shotie