Title: RE: [JBoss-user] Tomcat 4.0 & JBoss 2.4.0
the 1st apache release of the xml framework was xerces.jar
-Original Message-
From: Philip Van Bogaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Tomcat
You could reverse the question, Why use xerces when you got jaxp and
crimson?
Tbone
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolai P Guba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Tomcat 4.0 & JBos
Herve Tchepannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> actually, Im comfuse with crimson? what the purpose of that jar
> when xerces does the job?
It's a choice of XML parser implementation. JAXP is a generic
interface whereas crimson is the driver implementation. Xerces does
both in one go.
The on
f that jar when xerces does the job?
-Original Message-
From: Nicolai P Guba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Tomcat 4.0 & JBoss 2.4.0
"Saint-Martin Cecile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please Nicolai... make an effort... deadline is approaching quickly
> my 0.02 DM.-
your 0.02 ?
;)))
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] Tomcat 4.0 & JBoss 2.4.0
actually, Im comfuse with crimson?
what the purpose of that jar when xerces does the job?
-Original Message-
From: Nicolai P Guba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
"Saint-Martin Cecile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, I have found what is the problem. JBoss was using Apache
> Xerces for parser and tomcat was using Jaxp. I delete jaxp.jar and
> crimson.jar directory and it's OK.
Hmmm, I wonder why bother with crimson.jar and jaxp.jar when xerces
got
Sorry, I have found what is the problem.
JBoss was using Apache Xerces for parser and tomcat was using Jaxp.
I delete jaxp.jar and crimson.jar directory and it's OK.
SAINT-MARTIN Cecile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la par
Does your class has a *constructor* with no arguments? (not a *create*
method with no argument)
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Saint-Martin Cecile
> Envoyé : mercredi, 26 septembre 2001 15:33
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : [JB
