On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 00:30, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
There are a couple of solutions to this:
1) The finder takes a 'update-intent', basically exclusive, lock in the
database.
A fix that does this has been vetoed by Bill Burke, although you can
implement it
yourself with BMP or by using
Is this not taken care of if Commit Option B or C is specified ?
raghu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy
Boynes
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] transactions synchronizations
Commit Option B/C with Instance Per Transaction should work??
raghu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy
Boynes
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] transactions synchronizations
There are a couple of solutions to this:
1) The finder takes a 'update-intent', basically exclusive, lock in the
database.
A fix that does this has been vetoed by Bill Burke, although you can
implement it
yourself with BMP or by using database-specific declared-sql/ for
the finder.
2) Leave
