At 10:24 AM 3/20/01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:24 AM 3/20/01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> There are a lot of users, especially students, who don't have
>> cygwin. I think
>> it's too much to ask a first-semester computers science
>> student to master not
>> only Java and Emacs
What about using jam http://www.perforce.com/jam/jam.html?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kinnucan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:37 PM
To: Nascif Abousalh-Neto; Schewe, Jon (MN65)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PROPOSAL: New Java Build Feature
At 05:0
ECB layout looks great.
I can not seem to get ECB-method window to display methods in my C or
C++(file extensions .cxx, .hxx)files. Methods are displayed OK for .h
files. I have customized ECB so that it shows .cxx .hxx files. I don't
know if this is a current limitation or is there something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jesper Nordenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ECB, Emacs Code Browser, version 1.0 has been released. It can be
> > found at:
> >
> >
> > Contributions and suggestions are welcome!
>
> Sugge
> ECB layout looks great.
> I can not seem to get ECB-method window to display methods in my C or
> C++(file extensions .cxx, .hxx)files. Methods are displayed OK for .h
> files. I have customized ECB so that it shows .cxx .hxx
> files. I don't
> know if this is a current limitation or is the
Folks,
I tried to look through the jde's .el files and tried
to look through the jde documentation. I could
not figure out the real purpose of jde-project-name ?
How is the variable jde-project-name really used ?
What is its relationship to the project file ?
What is the intended use of the varia
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m>, "Denis, Ronald J (Ronald)** CTR **" writes:
: I too use ant for my builds. It does not compile
: every file every time. However, admittedly there have
: been times when compile errors occur which only go away
: upon a full rebuild. This doesn't happen often
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's also why Ant cannot handle the following case unless you do a full,
> clean build:
>
> 1. write the following classes
> class A {
> void foo() { }
> }
>
> class B extends A {
> void bar() { foo(); }
> }
>
> 2. build and run: everything is fine.
>
> 3. now c