Re: How to set current working directory?

2001-10-05 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
the platform they maintain their power, otherwise they become just another member in a large community, albeit an important member. > If Java was Open Source/Free Software issues like this could be > fixed much like they are done under an Open language like Python. Maybe they don't

Re: Dynamic menus (Warning -- slightly offtopic)

2001-08-28 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
lso look for usage patters inside JDE and other packages that use easymenu. Best regards, -- Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://orion.nsr.hp.com/ (inside HP's firewall only) http://sourceforge.net/users/ovidiu/ (my SourceForge page) http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other stuff)

Re: Semantic and xml

2001-06-23 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Hi John, On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:15:37 -0700 (PDT), "John L. Utz III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an idea. > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:03:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 2.0 available

2001-06-23 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
't make sense to have two different packages with similar functionality. Regards, -- Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://orion.nsr.hp.com/ (inside HP's firewall only) http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other stuff)

Re: Semantic and xml

2001-06-21 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
files in a similar way to which it parses java or c++ files. How would see such an user interface? One possibility I see right now is to combine semantic with speedbar or ECB, and show in the window a hierarchical view of the XML document. I'm a little worried though that for large docu

Re: JDE vs. VAJ

2001-06-12 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:46:55 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jikes also has an incremental compilation mode that you may want to look > into. > Basically, you run jikes with the list of files you want compiled, and > give it the incremental mode flag. After it has compield the files you > h

Re: AW: jde-help-find-javadoc problem in beta4

2001-03-27 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
On 27 Mar 2001 22:03:26 -0500, Peter Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be cleaner just to change line 110 from > > (if (which "wget") > > to > > (if (executable-find "wget") > > executable-find has the advantage of being in the standard emacs > distribution (Emacs 20.7), so the

Re: ANN: JDE 2.2.7beta3 available at ...

2001-03-19 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
rough http. Would it be possible for you to include the version of the package in its name, instead of just jde-beta.tar.gz? I think this will avoid issues with caching Web proxies. Regards, Ovidiu On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:35:20 -0500, Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:06 AM 3/

Re: ANN: JDE 2.2.7beta3 available at ...

2001-03-19 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Oops, sorry, I downloaded the wrong file. However it does look like you updated only the .zip file, and forgot the .tar.gz, which is still 2.2.7beta2. Ovidiu On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:06:11 -0800, Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul, > > I noticed that the direct

Re: ANN: JDE 2.2.7beta3 available at ...

2001-03-19 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Paul, I noticed that the directory name when I unarchive the package is jde-2.2.6 instead of jde-2.2.7beta3. Regards, Ovidiu On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 07:43:49 -0500, Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://jde.sunsite.dk/ > > > JDE 2.2.7beta3 > > ***

Re: JIT

2001-03-12 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Isn't the latest JDK 1.3 from Sun or IBM a HotSpot compiler? This is what I get when I run java -version: Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0beta_refresh-b09) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0beta-b07, mixed mode) I observed _huge_ performance improvements in the

Re: Printable users guide

2001-03-07 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
This is very nice, thanks for the work! I assume you converted the XML documentation to texinfo format? What tool did you use to do the conversion? Regards, Ovidiu On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:26:07 -0600, "Mark Mynsted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, here is one to get you by until I get time to

Re: Aarrgh! Can't get JDE or Xslt-Process to build.

2001-02-20 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Since both JDE and XSLT-process fail, my guess there must be something wrong with a package they depend on. Since vals is in the definition generated by semantic, this smells like a semantic issue. Ovidiu On 20 Feb 2001 13:51:05 +1000, Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no hair le

ANN: XSLT-process 1.1 available

2001-01-16 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Oops, it looks like I forgot to post the URL. Here it is again: --- XSLT-process is a minor mode for (X)Emacs that allows you to invoke an XSLT processor of choice on a buffer, displaying the result in an additional buffer. Currently supported processors include Xalan 1.x, and Saxon 5.x and 6.x

ANN: XSLT-process 1.1 available

2001-01-16 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
XSLT-process is a minor mode for (X)Emacs that allows you to invoke an XSLT processor of choice on a buffer, displaying the result in an additional buffer. Currently supported processors include Xalan 1.x, and Saxon 5.x and 6.x. Cocoon 1.8.x, an XML publishing framework, is also supported through

Re: semantic's behavior

2001-01-10 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
How about an option in semantic to disable the display of the hashmarks? At least the user doesn't get distracted while typing. Ovidiu On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:08:10 -0500, Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:44 AM 1/10/01 -0600, you wrote: > >I'm under the impression that the behavi