RE: PROPOSAL: New Java Build Feature (LONG)

2001-03-23 Thread Ventimiglia, David
project has no non-public classes). Cheers, David -Original Message- From: Paul Kinnucan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: New Java Build Feature (LONG) At 07:29 PM 3/21/2001 -0800, you w

Re: PROPOSAL: New Java Build Feature (LONG)

2001-03-21 Thread Paul Kinnucan
At 07:29 PM 3/21/2001 -0800, you wrote: > >I stand corrected - the depend task works exactly as Mark says it does. > >Mark, thanks for bringing this to my attention. > Nevertheless, the Ant depend task admittedly does not detect all dependencies. I therefore question its value. I would not want t

Re: PROPOSAL: New Java Build Feature (LONG)

2001-03-21 Thread eric
I stand corrected - the depend task works exactly as Mark says it does. Mark, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Eric In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, M ark Bucciarelli writes: : Actually, Ant does handle the dependency example you present below. : : Use the optional task. The followi

RE: PROPOSAL: New Java Build Feature (LONG)

2001-03-21 Thread Mark Bucciarelli
Actually, Ant does handle the dependency example you present below. Use the optional task. The following build.xml will recompile both A.java and B.java in your step 4 below. If you're interested in reading the docs, I've included the text from the Ant manual for the