Berndl, Klaus writes:
> Paul Kinnucan wrote:
> > Berndl, Klaus writes:
> > > Suraj Acharya wrote:
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > > I replied too hastily earlier. On starting up a new emacs
> > process, > > switching buffers
> > > > as you describe results in loading the correct prj.el
David PONCE writes:
> Hi Paul,
>
> [...]
> > > >> ;; to a buffer belonging to another.
> > > >> (make-local-hook 'post-command-hook)
> > >
> > > >Hmm, I don't think I need the above form because the add-hook form below
> > > >makes the variable local anyway.
> > >
Hi Paul,
[...]
> > >> ;; to a buffer belonging to another.
> > >> (make-local-hook 'post-command-hook)
> >
> > >Hmm, I don't think I need the above form because the add-hook form below
> > >makes the variable local anyway.
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> I have removed the redundant
Hi Paul,
I replied too hastily earlier. On starting up a new emacs process,
switching buffers
as you describe results in loading the correct prj.el file.
However, after a while I can get myself into a situation where some of
my jde buffers do not have jde-detect-java-buffer-activation in their
p
Berndl, Klaus writes:
> >> ;; to a buffer belonging to another.
> >> (make-local-hook 'post-command-hook)
>
> >Hmm, I don't think I need the above form because the add-hook form below
> >makes the variable local anyway.
>
> Indeed.
I have removed the redundant form in the
Suraj Acharya writes:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:29:22 +0200 , Berndl, Klaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> ;; to a buffer belonging to another.
> > >> (make-local-hook 'post-command-hook)
> >
> > >Hmm, I don't think I need the above form because the add-hook form below
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:29:22 +0200 , Berndl, Klaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> ;; to a buffer belonging to another.
> >> (make-local-hook 'post-command-hook)
>
> >Hmm, I don't think I need the above form because the add-hook form below
> >makes the variable local anyway.
>
>
>> ;; to a buffer belonging to another.
>> (make-local-hook 'post-command-hook)
>Hmm, I don't think I need the above form because the add-hook form below
>makes the variable local anyway.
Indeed.
> > (add-hook 'post-command-hook
> > 'jde-detect-java-buff
