12:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: people using jdk < 1.2?
>
>
>
> One more thought on the classes data structure and I'll shut up. ;-)
> It would be nice if the data extracted from common jars could
> be shared
> across projects. That i
ng to see if they make a
: perceptible difference.
:
: - Paul
:
: - Original Message -
: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:06 AM
: Subject: Re: people using jdk < 1
L PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: people using jdk < 1.2?
>
> [java 1 vs. java 2 comments]
>
> : Has there been any documentation out about this? I don't see why using
the
> : Collections API would increase performa
cc:
Subject: RE: people using jdk <
> Are there JDE users who are using versions of Java before Java 2?
Even if there are, I think you can download the collections framework for
use with 1.1 versions of the JDK.
David
[java 1 vs. java 2 comments]
: Has there been any documentation out about this? I don't see why using the
: Collections API would increase performance.
Yes, a number of articles and book chapters have been written about
the cost of acquiring the synchronization lock on java objects. Since
eve
On 12 Aug 2001, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> Has there been any documentation out about this? I don't see why using the
> Collections API would increase performance.
Hashtable and Vector are fully synchronized whereas HashMap and ArrayList
are not. To get a synchronized collection in the new API yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Eric D. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there JDE users who are using versions of Java before Java 2?
>
> I ask because it seems that there are some opportunities to improve the
> performance of the reflection-based code in the JDE. Th
